Skip to main content
AE MD-144 530W-550W (535W) vs CME-132BDS-725 5 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

AE Solar AE MD-144 530W-550W (535W) vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725

AE Solar AE MD-144 530W-550W (535W)
AE MD-144 530W-550W (535W)
535 Wp 20.73 % PERC Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725
CME-132BDS-725
725 Wp 23.37 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

CME-132BDS-725 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 2.64 pp more efficient. 5 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 13 differences
How alike are they
5 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

13 of 18 parameters
Parameter AE MD-144 530W-550W (535W) CME-132BDS-725 Difference
Module efficiency 20.73 % 23.37 % 2.64 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient -0.350 %/°C -0.290 %/°C 0.060 %/°C better in heat
Rated power 535 Wp 725 Wp 190 W more power
Power density 207.3 Wp/m² 233.7 Wp/m² 26.4 Wp/m² higher
Weight 26.5 kg 37.0 kg 10.5 kg lighter
Product warranty 15 yrs 30 yrs 15 yrs longer
Short-circuit current 13.52 A 18.46 A 4.94 A apart
Module area 2.581 m² 3.103 m² 0.522 m² apart
Cell technology PERC TOPCon PERC vs TOPCon
Current at max power 12.76 A 17.47 A 4.71 A apart
Cell count 144 132 12 cells apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
Dimensions 2278x1133x30 mm 2383x1302x30 mm 2278x1133x30 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
AE MD-144 530W-550W (535W)
17,661 kWh
CME-132BDS-725
24,325 kWh
Lifetime gap
6,664 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario AE MD-144 530W-550W (535W) CME-132BDS-725
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 535 W 725 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.8% of rated power 507 W 693 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.5% of rated power 479 W 662 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.2% of rated power 451 W 630 W
03

Full specification

Parameter AE MD-144 530W-550W (535W) CME-132BDS-725 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 535 Wp 725 Wp +190 W for CME-132BDS-725
Module efficiency 20.73 % 23.37 % +2.64 pp for CME-132BDS-725
Power density 207.3 Wp/m² 233.7 Wp/m² +26.4 Wp/m² for CME-132BDS-725
Open-circuit voltage 49.78 V 49.30 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 41.93 V 41.50 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 13.52 A 18.46 A 4.94 A apart
Current at max power 12.76 A 17.47 A 4.71 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.350 %/°C -0.290 %/°C +0.060 %/°C for CME-132BDS-725
Mechanical
Dimensions 2278x1133x30 mm 2383x1302x30 mm 2278x1133x30 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm
Module area 2.581 m² 3.103 m² 0.522 m² apart
Weight 26.5 kg 37.0 kg -10.5 kg for AE MD-144 530W-550W (535W)
Weight per kWp 49.5 kg/kWp 51.0 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 30 yrs +15 yrs for CME-132BDS-725
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation - 0.40 %/yr Not published by AE Solar
Technology
Cell technology PERC TOPCon PERC vs TOPCon
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 132 12 cells apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#10,701 vs #930
CME-132BDS-725 leads by 9,771 places
Power density
#10,731 vs #923
CME-132BDS-725 leads by 9,808 places
Heat behaviour
#10,419 vs #2,165
CME-132BDS-725 leads by 8,254 places
Weight
#3,074 vs #4,382
AE MD-144 530W-550W (535W) leads by 1,308 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#7,399 vs #11
CME-132BDS-725 leads by 7,388 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE MD-144 530W-550W (535W) vs AE Solar AE MD-144 530W-550W (550W)
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE MD-144 530W-550W (535W) vs AE Solar AE MD-144 530W-550W (545W)
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE MD-144 530W-550W (535W) vs AE Solar AE MD-144 530W-550W (540W)
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE MD-144 530W-550W (535W) vs AE Solar AE MD-144 530W-550W (530W)
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W
One difference: product warranty
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: AE Solar AE MD-144 530W-550W (535W) or AE Solar CME-132BDS-725?
According to our database: AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 has higher module efficiency (23.37% vs 20.73%); AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.290%/°C vs -0.350%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AE Solar AE MD-144 530W-550W (535W) and AE Solar CME-132BDS-725?
AE Solar AE MD-144 530 W-550 W (535 W) has a module efficiency of 20.73%, while AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 is 23.37%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AE Solar AE MD-144 530W-550W (535W) use vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725?
AE Solar AE MD-144 530 W-550 W (535 W) uses PERC cells; AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AE Solar AE MD-144 530W-550W (535W) and AE Solar CME-132BDS-725?
AE Solar AE MD-144 530 W-550 W (535 W) has a 30 years power warranty; AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AE Solar AE MD-144 530W-550W (535W) and AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 bifacial panels?
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); AE Solar AE MD-144 530 W-550 W (535 W) is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 5 AE Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.