Skip to main content
144BDS-585 vs 108BDS 440W 12 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-585 vs AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 440W

AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-585
AE CMD-144BDS-585
585 Wp 22.67 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 440W
AE CMD-108BDS 440W
440 Wp 22.57 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

7 differences, and they point both ways

The largest is rated power: 145 W more power. 12 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 7 differences
How alike are they
12 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

7 of 19 parameters
Parameter 144BDS-585 108BDS 440W Difference
Rated power 585 Wp 440 Wp 145 W more power
Weight 31.0 kg 23.5 kg 7.5 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage 52.18 V 38.66 V 13.52 V apart
Module area 2.581 m² 1.950 m² 0.631 m² apart
Voltage at max power 43.14 V 32.84 V 10.30 V apart
Cell count 144 108 36 cells apart
Dimensions 2278x1133x30 mm 1721x1133x30 mm 2278x1133x30 mm vs 1721x1133x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
144BDS-585
19,628 kWh
108BDS 440W
14,763 kWh
Lifetime gap
4,865 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 144BDS-585 108BDS 440W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 585 W 440 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 560 W 421 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 534 W 402 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 509 W 383 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 144BDS-585 108BDS 440W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 585 Wp 440 Wp +145 W for 144BDS-585
Module efficiency 22.67 % 22.57 % Effectively the same
Power density 226.7 Wp/m² 225.7 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 52.18 V 38.66 V 13.52 V apart
Voltage at max power 43.14 V 32.84 V 10.30 V apart
Short-circuit current 14.47 A 14.30 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.56 A 13.40 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2278x1133x30 mm 1721x1133x30 mm 2278x1133x30 mm vs 1721x1133x30 mm
Module area 2.581 m² 1.950 m² 0.631 m² apart
Weight 31.0 kg 23.5 kg -7.5 kg for 108BDS 440W
Weight per kWp 53.0 kg/kWp 53.4 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 108 36 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#3,506 vs #3,882
144BDS-585 leads by 376 places
Power density
#3,480 vs #3,848
144BDS-585 leads by 368 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#6,697 vs #7,325
144BDS-585 leads by 628 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,257 vs #5,405
144BDS-585 leads by 4,148 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-585 vs AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-590
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-585 vs AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-580
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-585 vs AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-575
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-585 vs AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-570
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-585 vs AE Solar CMD-108BDS-440
8 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-585 vs AE Solar CMD-108BDS-435
10 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-585 or AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 440W?
According to our database: AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-585 has higher module efficiency (22.67% vs 22.57%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-585 and AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 440W?
AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-585 has a module efficiency of 22.67%, while AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 440 W is 22.57%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-585 use vs AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 440W?
AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-585 uses TOPCon cells; AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 440 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-585 and AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 440W?
AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-585 has a 30 years power warranty; AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 440 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-585 and AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 440W bifacial panels?
Both AE Solar AE CMD-144BDS-585 and AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 440 W are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 5 AE Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.