425W vs 435W 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 425W vs AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 435W

Q: Which panel is better: AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 425W or AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 435W?

According to our database: AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 435W has higher module efficiency (22.31% vs 21.80%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

Q: What is the efficiency of AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 425W and AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 435W?

AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 425W has a module efficiency of 21.80%, while AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 435W is 22.31%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

Q: What cell technology does AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 425W use vs AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 435W?

AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 425W uses TOPCon cells; AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 435W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

Q: What is the warranty on AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 425W and AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 435W?

AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 425W has a 30 years power warranty; AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 435W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Q: Are AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 425W and AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 435W bifacial panels?

Both AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 425W and AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 435W are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

AE CMD-108BDS 425W

425 Wp 21.80 % TOPCon Bifacial

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

AE CMD-108BDS 435W

435 Wp 22.31 % TOPCon Bifacial

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

The verdict

435W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.51 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences

How alike are they

16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical

identical differs

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters

Parameter 425W 435W Difference

Module efficiency 21.80 % 22.31 % 0.51 pp more efficient

Power density 218.0 Wp/m² 223.1 Wp/m² 5.1 Wp/m² higher

Rated power 425 Wp 435 Wp 10 W more power

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Cell temperature

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

425W

14,260 kWh

435W

14,595 kWh

Lifetime gap

335 kWh

Output when it is hot

Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees

Scenario 425W 435W

Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 425 W 435 W

Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 407 W 416 W

Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 388 W 397 W

Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 370 W 378 W

Full specification

Parameter 425W 435W Difference

Power and efficiency

Rated power 425 Wp 435 Wp +10 W for 435W

Module efficiency 21.80 % 22.31 % +0.51 pp for 435W

Power density 218.0 Wp/m² 223.1 Wp/m² +5.1 Wp/m² for 435W

Open-circuit voltage 38.08 V 38.46 V Effectively the same

Voltage at max power 32.25 V 32.64 V Effectively the same

Short-circuit current 14.10 A 14.23 A Effectively the same

Current at max power 13.18 A 13.33 A Effectively the same

Temperature

Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same

Mechanical

Dimensions 1721x1133x30 mm 1721x1133x30 mm Same

Module area 1.950 m² 1.950 m² Same

Weight 23.5 kg 23.5 kg Same

Weight per kWp 55.3 kg/kWp 54.0 kg/kWp Effectively the same

Warranty and degradation

Product warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same

Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same

Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same

Technology

Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same

Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same

Cell count 108 108 Same

Bifacial Yes Yes Same

Against the whole database

14,005 panels

Efficiency

#7,022 vs #5,082

435W leads by 1,940 places

Power density

#7,018 vs #5,070

435W leads by 1,948 places

Heat behaviour

#2,165 vs #2,165

Tied - the same position in the database

Weight

#9,746 vs #8,229

435W leads by 1,517 places

Warranty

#21 vs #21

Tied - the same position in the database

Overall

#6,904 vs #5,914

435W leads by 990 places

More useful comparisons

Open the full database

Same series, other bin

AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 425W vs AE Solar CMD-108BDS-440

4 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 425W vs AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 440W

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 425W vs AE Solar CMD-108BDS-435

4 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 425W vs AE Solar CMD-108BDS-430

2 differences, the largest is product warranty

Same series, other bin

AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 425W vs AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 430W

One difference: module efficiency

Same series, other bin

AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 425W vs AE Solar CMD-108BDS-425

One difference: product warranty

Written summary

Checking cache...

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 425W or AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 435W?

According to our database: AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 435 W has higher module efficiency (22.31% vs 21.80%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

What is the efficiency of AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 425W and AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 435W?

AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 425 W has a module efficiency of 21.80%, while AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 435 W is 22.31%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

What cell technology does AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 425W use vs AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 435W?

AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 425 W uses TOPCon cells; AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 435 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

What is the warranty on AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 425W and AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 435W?

AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 425 W has a 30 years power warranty; AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 435 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Are AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 425W and AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 435W bifacial panels?

Both AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 425 W and AE Solar AE CMD-108BDS 435 W are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 5 AE Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.