Growatt MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E) vs Fronius Verto 25.0
VS

Fronius International
Fronius Verto 25.0
25 kW
97.4 % euro
Grid-tie
The verdict
MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E) leads on the differences that matter
The largest is european efficiency: 1.2 pp more efficient. 10 of 22 comparable parameters are identical, with 10 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.
See all 12 differencesHow alike are they
10
of 22 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
12 of 22 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E)
Fronius Verto 25.0
Difference
European efficiency
98.6 %
97.4 %
1.2 pp more efficient
Max DC voltage
1100 V
1000 V
100 V apart
Max input current per tracker
40.0 A
28.0 A
12.0 A more headroom
Max efficiency
98.8 %
97.5 %
1.3 pp more efficient
Max AC power
27.70 kW
25.00 kW
2.70 kW apart
Weight
24.0 kg
41.8 kg
17.8 kg lighter
Weight per kW
1.0 kg/kW
1.7 kg/kW
0.7 kg/kW lighter
Max AC current
42.0 A
37.9 A
4.1 A apart
Start voltage
200 V
150 V
50 V earlier start
MPP trackers
3
4
1 tracker more
MPPT voltage range
200-1000 V
150-870 V
200-1000 V vs 150-870 V
Dimensions
415x528x225 mm
865x574x279 mm
415x528x225 mm vs 865x574x279 mm
02
Full specification
Parameter
MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E)
Fronius Verto 25.0
Difference
AC output
Rated AC power
25.00 kW
25.00 kW
Same
Max AC power
27.70 kW
25.00 kW
2.70 kW apart
Grid connection
3-phase
3-phase
Same
Nominal AC voltage
400 V
400 V
Same
Max AC current
42.0 A
37.9 A
4.1 A apart
PV input
Max PV power
37.50 kW
37.50 kW
Same
DC/AC ratio
1.50
1.50
Same
Max DC voltage
1100 V
1000 V
100 V apart
MPPT voltage range
200-1000 V
150-870 V
200-1000 V vs 150-870 V
Start voltage
200 V
150 V
-50 V for Fronius Verto 25.0
MPP trackers
3
4
+1 trackers for Fronius Verto 25.0
Strings per tracker
-
2
Not published by Growatt
Max input current per tracker
40.0 A
28.0 A
+12.0 A for MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E)
Efficiency
European efficiency
98.6 %
97.4 %
+1.2 pp for MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E)
Max efficiency
98.8 %
97.5 %
+1.3 pp for MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E)
CEC efficiency
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Battery
Battery input
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Battery voltage
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Max charge current
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Backup power
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Physical
Weight
24.0 kg
41.8 kg
-17.8 kg for MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E)
Weight per kW
1.0 kg/kW
1.7 kg/kW
-0.7 kg/kW for MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E)
Dimensions
415x528x225 mm
865x574x279 mm
415x528x225 mm vs 865x574x279 mm
Ingress protection
IP66
IP66
Same
Cooling
forced-air
forced-air
Same
Noise
-
56 dB
Not published by Growatt
Max operating temperature
60 °C
60 °C
Same
Connectivity and safety
Wi-Fi
Yes
Yes
Same
Ethernet
-
Yes
Not published by Growatt
Arc fault protection
-
Yes
Not published by Growatt
Integrated DC switch
Yes
Yes
Same
Warranty
Warranty
5 yrs
-
Not published by Fronius International
03
Open all inverters
More useful comparisons
Same type, similar size
Growatt
Growatt MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E) vs Growatt MID 25KTL3-X
6 differences, the largest is start voltage
Same type, similar size
Growatt
Growatt MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E) vs Growatt MID 25KTL3-X1
5 differences, the largest is max input current per tracker
Same type, similar size
GoodWe
Growatt MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E) vs GoodWe GW25K-MT
10 differences, the largest is max input current per tracker
04
Written summary
Checking cache...
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate.
