GoodWe GW40K-ET-10 vs Growatt MID 40K-HU
VS
The verdict
13 differences, and they point both ways
The largest is european efficiency: 0.6 pp more efficient. 13 of 26 comparable parameters are identical, with 6 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.
See all 13 differencesHow alike are they
13
of 26 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
13 of 26 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
GW40K-ET-10
MID 40K-HU
Difference
European efficiency
97.8 %
97.2 %
0.6 pp more efficient
Max input current per tracker
42.0 A
40.0 A
2.0 A more headroom
Max AC power
44.00 kW
40.00 kW
4.00 kW apart
Max PV power
60.00 kW
80.00 kW
20.00 kW apart
DC/AC ratio
1.50
2.00
0.50 more oversizing headroom
Max charge current
100 A
42 A
58 A faster charging
Weight
62.0 kg
48.0 kg
14.0 kg lighter
Max efficiency
98.1 %
98.6 %
0.5 pp more efficient
Nominal AC voltage
380 V
400 V
20 V apart
Weight per kW
1.6 kg/kW
1.2 kg/kW
0.4 kg/kW lighter
MPPT voltage range
165-850 V
200-1000 V
165-850 V vs 200-1000 V
Battery voltage
200-800 V
600-980 V
200-800 V vs 600-980 V
Dimensions
660x520x260 mm
570x680x256 mm
660x520x260 mm vs 570x680x256 mm
02
Full specification
Parameter
GW40K-ET-10
MID 40K-HU
Difference
AC output
Rated AC power
40.00 kW
40.00 kW
Same
Max AC power
44.00 kW
40.00 kW
4.00 kW apart
Grid connection
3-phase
3-phase
Same
Nominal AC voltage
380 V
400 V
20 V apart
Max AC current
66.7 A
66.7 A
Same
PV input
Max PV power
60.00 kW
80.00 kW
20.00 kW apart
DC/AC ratio
1.50
2.00
+0.50 for MID 40K-HU
Max DC voltage
1000 V
1000 V
Same
MPPT voltage range
165-850 V
200-1000 V
165-850 V vs 200-1000 V
Start voltage
160 V
160 V
Same
MPP trackers
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Strings per tracker
2
2
Same
Max input current per tracker
42.0 A
40.0 A
+2.0 A for GW40K-ET-10
Efficiency
European efficiency
97.8 %
97.2 %
+0.6 pp for GW40K-ET-10
Max efficiency
98.1 %
98.6 %
+0.5 pp for MID 40K-HU
CEC efficiency
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Battery
Battery input
Yes
Yes
Same
Battery voltage
200-800 V
600-980 V
200-800 V vs 600-980 V
Max charge current
100 A
42 A
+58 A for GW40K-ET-10
Backup power
-
30.0 kW
Not published by GoodWe
Physical
Weight
62.0 kg
48.0 kg
-14.0 kg for MID 40K-HU
Weight per kW
1.6 kg/kW
1.2 kg/kW
-0.4 kg/kW for MID 40K-HU
Dimensions
660x520x260 mm
570x680x256 mm
660x520x260 mm vs 570x680x256 mm
Ingress protection
IP66
IP66
Same
Cooling
forced-air
forced-air
Same
Noise
-
55 dB
Not published by GoodWe
Max operating temperature
60 °C
60 °C
Same
Connectivity and safety
Wi-Fi
Yes
Yes
Same
Ethernet
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Arc fault protection
Yes
Yes
Same
Integrated DC switch
Yes
Yes
Same
Warranty
Warranty
-
5 yrs
Not published by GoodWe
03
Open all inverters
More useful comparisons
Same type, similar size
Ginlong Solis
GoodWe GW40K-ET-10 vs Ginlong Solis S6-EH3P40K-H
15 differences, the largest is max input current per tracker
Same type, similar size
Deye
GoodWe GW40K-ET-10 vs Deye SUN-40K-SG01HP3-EU-BM4
13 differences, the largest is european efficiency
Same type, similar size
Growatt
GoodWe GW40K-ET-10 vs Growatt WT 40K-H-US L2 / WT 40K-HU-US L2
13 differences, the largest is max dc voltage
04
Written summary
Checking cache...
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate.

