Skip to main content

AUSTA ENERGY vs Jinko Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison

AUSTA ENERGY
India Founded 2015
Read the AUSTA ENERGY review
VS
Jinko Solar
China Founded 2006 Tier 1
Read the Jinko Solar review
At a glance

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 58 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. AUSTA ENERGY leans bifacial (62% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
58 637
Highest power
730 Wp 735 Wp
Best efficiency
23.5% 24.8%
Average efficiency
21.9% 22.2%
Bifacial share
62% 36%
Average warranty
30 yrs 29 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
AUSTA ENERGY

AUSTA Energy is an Indian solar panel manufacturer based in Surat, Gujarat. The company produces monocrystalline and polycrystalline solar modules for residential and commercial applications, focusing on the domestic Indian market and select export markets.

Founded
2015
Headquarters
Surat, India
Annual capacity
1 GW/year
Employees
200
Jinko Solar

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Founded
2006
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Annual capacity
130.0 GW/year
Employees
33,830
Listed
NYSE: JKS
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric AUSTA ENERGY Jinko Solar
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 58 637+579
Max Power 730 W 735 W+5 W
Avg Power 571 W+48 W 523 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 23.50% 24.80%+1.30 pp
Avg Efficiency 21.85% 22.18%+0.32 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.295%/°C+0.009 -0.304%/°C
Bifacial Share 36 (62%)+26 pp 231 (36%)
Avg Warranty 30.0 yrs+1.3 yr 28.7 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

AUSTA ENERGY offers more 600W+ panels (38% of lineup)

AUSTA ENERGY cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (55%)

Jinko Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (41%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

AUSTA ENERGY is an Indian solar panel manufacturer founded in 2015, with approximately 200 employees and an annual production capacity of 1 GW. The company does not hold Tier 1 bankable status, which limits its appeal for project-financed installations and makes some lenders and insurers hesitant. Jinko Solar, by contrast, is one of the world's largest solar manufacturers - founded in China in 2006, listed on the NYSE, employing over 33,000 people and operating with a production capacity of 130 GW per year. Jinko carries full Tier 1 bankable certification, giving it a decisive advantage in utility-scale and commercially financed projects globally. From an efficiency standpoint, Jinko's portfolio peaks at 24.8% module efficiency with an average of 22.0% across 545 models, while AUSTA's 58-model lineup reaches a maximum of 23.5% with an average of 21.85%.

AUSTA ENERGY's portfolio stands out for its higher average module power output - 570.7 Wp versus Jinko's 511.1 Wp - indicating a focus on large-format modules suited to rooftop prosumer and commercial C&I installations where fewer, higher-power panels are preferred. AUSTA also carries a notably high bifacial share at 62.1% of its portfolio, compared to 31.9% for Jinko, making it competitive for ground-mount and flat-roof installations where albedo gain is significant. AUSTA's average temperature coefficient of -0.295%/°C is slightly more favorable than Jinko's -0.308%/°C, offering a marginal yield advantage in hot summer conditions. AUSTA also offers a longer average product warranty at 30 years, versus Jinko's 28.5 years. Jinko's primary technological strength lies in its TOPCon N-type lineup - comprising 39.4% of its portfolio - backed by repeated PVEL Top Performer recognition and a long track record of real-world deployment across more than 300 GW of global installations, making it particularly well suited to utility-scale ground-mount projects and large commercial rooftops.

For international buyers choosing between the two, Jinko Solar offers unmatched supply chain reliability, bankability, and a proven global service network - critical factors for large projects requiring financing or insurance. AUSTA ENERGY may appeal to buyers seeking high-power bifacial modules with a longer warranty guarantee at a potentially competitive price point, but the absence of Tier 1 certification is a meaningful constraint for any project where institutional financing or stringent risk assessment is involved.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-12

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
AUSTA ENERGY A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Jinko Solar
Manufacturers
AUSTA ENERGY AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Jinko Solar
Manufacturers
AUSTA ENERGY AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Jinko Solar
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 3 AUSTA ENERGY offers · See 173 Jinko Solar offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.