Skip to main content

Astronergy vs Q-Cells - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Astronergy
China Founded 2006 Tier 1
Read the Astronergy review
VS
Q-Cells
South Korea Founded 1999 Tier 1
Read the Q-Cells review
At a glance

Astronergy has the broader catalog (150 vs 89 models). Astronergy leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Astronergy leans bifacial (69% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
150 89
Highest power
735 Wp 675 Wp
Best efficiency
24.8% 23.2%
Average efficiency
22.7% 21.2%
Bifacial share
69% 39%
Average warranty
30 yrs 27 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Astronergy

Astronergy is a global manufacturer and supplier of solar modules, and a subsidiary of Chint Group, one of the world's leading providers of smart energy solutions. The company focuses on the R&D, production, and sales of high-efficiency crystalline silicon PV cells and PV modules. Astronergy has established...

Founded
2006
Headquarters
Hangzhou, China
Annual capacity
76+ GW/year
Employees
12000+
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Q-Cells

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...

Founded
1999
Headquarters
Seoul, South Korea
Annual capacity
11.2 GW/year
Employees
2000+
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Astronergy Q-Cells
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 150+61 89
Max Power 735 W+60 W 675 W
Avg Power 540 W+71 W 468 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 24.80%+1.60 pp 23.20%
Avg Efficiency 22.71%+1.49 pp 21.21%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.293%/°C+0.031 -0.325%/°C
Bifacial Share 104 (69%)+30 pp 35 (39%)
Avg Warranty 29.6 yrs+2.6 yr 27.0 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Astronergy skews to higher efficiency: 39% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Astronergy offers more 600W+ panels (40% of lineup)

Astronergy cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (89%)

Q-Cells cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (43%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Astronergy, established in 2006 as a subsidiary of China's CHINT Group and headquartered in Hangzhou, has grown into a high-volume global shipper, reporting cumulative module shipments exceeding 150 GW and 18.5 GW of shipments in the first half of 2025 alone. The company holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status, ranked among the top six manufacturers in BloombergNEF's 2023 assessment, and was recognized as a Tier 1 PV Module Supplier in S&P Global's inaugural 2025 Cleantech Companies list. Q-Cells, now operating as Hanwha Qcells after South Korea's Hanwha Solutions acquired the originally German brand, likewise carries BloombergNEF Tier 1 status and, according to Wood Mackenzie's U.S. PV Leaderboard, holds the leading market-share position in both U.S. residential and commercial segments. Qcells also runs the largest solar manufacturing facility in the Western Hemisphere in Dalton, Georgia, giving it a meaningful domestic supply-chain advantage in North America. On the strength of its Western market penetration and institutional relationships, Qcells currently commands the stronger brand footprint in regulated, finance-heavy project environments.

Astronergy's current product lineup is anchored by N-type TOPCon bifacial modules under the ASTRO N5 and ASTRO N7 families, with the N5 series oriented toward utility-scale and large commercial ground mounts and the N7 series, including an all-black variant, aimed at residential and commercial rooftop applications. The company also retains PERC modules for price-sensitive projects. Qcells structures its portfolio around the Q.TRON family, built on the company's proprietary Q.ANTUM NEO N-type TOPCon cell technology, targeting premium residential rooftops and mid-scale commercial systems, with the Q.TRON BLK M-G2+ serving the all-black residential niche. Both manufacturers have made N-type TOPCon the centerpiece of their 2025 product strategies.

For most buyers in 2025, the two brands are closely matched: both appeared among top performers across multiple categories in the 2025 Renewable Energy Test Center reliability and quality evaluations. Qcells is the stronger default for North American residential or commercial buyers who value domestically produced panels, deep installer networks, or IRA domestic-content compliance. Astronergy is a compelling alternative where budget pressure is real and domestic content is not a hard requirement, particularly in utility-scale or international markets where its scale drives competitive module pricing. Neither brand should be ruled out on quality grounds.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-13

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Astronergy A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Q-Cells
Manufacturers
Astronergy AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Q-Cells
Manufacturers
Astronergy AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Q-Cells
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 41 Astronergy offers · See 25 Q-Cells offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.