Astronergy vs Jolywood - solar panel manufacturer comparison
Astronergy has the broader catalog (150 vs 128 models). Astronergy leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Jolywood leans bifacial (86% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
Astronergy is a global manufacturer and supplier of solar modules, and a subsidiary of Chint Group, one of the world's leading providers of smart energy solutions. The company focuses on the R&D, production, and sales of high-efficiency crystalline silicon PV cells and PV modules. Astronergy has established...
- Founded
- 2006
- Headquarters
- Hangzhou, China
- Annual capacity
- 76+ GW/year
- Employees
- 12000+
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
- Founded
- 2008
- Headquarters
- Taizhou, China
- Listed
- SZSE: 300393
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
Astronergy skews to higher efficiency: 39% of lineup is 23%+
Astronergy offers more 600W+ panels (40% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: TOPCon (89%)
Dominant cell tech: TOPCon (95%)
The flagships
Written summary
Astronergy is the solar manufacturing brand of China's Chint Group, originally founded under Chint's industrial electrical business before expanding into module production. It holds confirmed Tier 1 status, having been named a Tier 1 PV module supplier on S&P Global Commodity Insights' first 2025 Tier 1 Cleantech Companies list, and it ranked sixth among module manufacturers in BloombergNEF's 2023 bankability survey. The company reports cumulative global shipments above 150 GW, with annual module capacity in the tens of GW and plans to approach 100 GW by 2025, according to company statements. Jolywood, founded in 2016 as a subsidiary of Jolywood Group, built its reputation as an early pioneer of N-type bifacial cell technology and has also been described in retailer and company materials as a Tier 1 brand per BloombergNEF, with coverage from Munich Re on the insurance side, though these claims are largely self-reported rather than independently confirmed in the sources found. Its production scale is considerably smaller, with cell capacity near 20 GW and module capacity around 10 GW as of its most recent PVEL profile, and a German analysis notes the listed company posted losses in 2024 and has been majority state-controlled since 2023. On institutional footprint, Astronergy clearly has the stronger and more independently verified standing, backed by a larger industrial parent, broader global shipment history, and a direct S&P Global Tier 1 listing.
Astronergy's product lineup spans both residential and utility-scale segments, with its newer ASTRO N7 and N7s zero-busbar TOPCon modules (built on TOPCon 5.0 cells) aimed at reducing microcrack risk, alongside higher-wattage N7 Pro and N8 Pro multi-busbar modules exceeding 700-800 W for commercial and utility ground-mount use, and it continues to offer PERC-based modules, including a US-assembled PERC line, for cost-sensitive projects. Jolywood is more narrowly focused on N-type TOPCon bifacial modules for residential and commercial rooftops, exemplified by its Niwa Black series (415-450 W, black-frame, around 22.5-23% module efficiency), positioning it as a boutique specialist in premium bifacial residential panels rather than a broad-spectrum supplier across utility, commercial, and residential markets.
For a typical buyer in 2025, Astronergy is the safer default thanks to its confirmed Tier 1 and BloombergNEF bankability standing, larger manufacturing base, and wider product range spanning both utility and rooftop applications, which generally translates into stronger long-term warranty backing and supply continuity. Jolywood remains a credible niche choice for buyers specifically prioritizing aesthetics and bifacial N-type performance on residential rooftops, but its smaller scale, reported 2024 financial losses, and reliance on self-reported Tier 1 claims warrant extra diligence, particularly around warranty servicing over a 25-30 year horizon.
Generated by Claude Sonnet 5 · 2026-10-20
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 37 Astronergy offers · See 26 Jolywood offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.