ASM vs Lina Energy - solar panel manufacturer comparison
Lina Energy has the broader catalog (37 vs 1 models). Lina Energy leads on peak efficiency at 22.37%. Lina Energy leans bifacial (19% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
Australian Solar Manufacturing (ASM) is a small Australian solar panel assembler that produces crystalline monocrystalline modules domestically using components sourced from Germany, Japan, the USA, and China. The company focuses on providing locally assembled PV modules tailored to Australian conditions, supporting...
- Founded
- 2009
- Headquarters
- Hallam, Victoria, Australia
- Employees
- 1-10
LiNa Energy is a technology company specializing in the development and provision of low-cost, high-performance, and safe sodium batteries. The company focuses on renewable energy storage solutions, offering a safer and more sustainable alternative to lithium-ion batteries. Their solid-state sodium battery technology...
- Founded
- 2017
- Headquarters
- Lancaster, United Kingdom
- Employees
- 28
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (30%)
The flagships
Written summary
ASM, short for Australian Solar Manufacturing, is a small panel assembler founded in 2009 and based in Keysborough, Victoria, Australia. The company assembles monocrystalline modules domestically using imported components sourced from Germany, Japan, the United States, and China, but does not manufacture photovoltaic cells itself. No BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability listing for ASM was confirmed in available public sources. Lina Energy is a newer entrant established around 2016-2017 and headquartered in Bulgaria, with additional branches in Jordan and China; it positions itself as an integrated renewable energy company covering solar module supply, EPC services, and energy storage. Lina Energy similarly does not appear on available BloombergNEF Tier 1 lists. Between the two, neither commands a strong institutional footprint, though Lina Energy's broader geographic presence across Europe, the Middle East, and Central Asia gives it a modestly wider commercial reach.
ASM's documented product lineup sits in the 170-200 Wp range - specifications well behind the 400-500 Wp modules that now define standard residential and commercial installations globally. This constrains ASM's relevance primarily to customers replacing older low-wattage systems or to buyers with a firm preference for Australian-assembled hardware. Lina Energy, by contrast, offers a broader portfolio with outputs reportedly reaching up to 550 W and includes TOPCon cell technology in a portion of its lineup, making it more compatible with contemporary residential rooftops and light commercial projects. The company also covers BIPV applications and energy storage, widening its total addressable market.
For most buyers in 2025, Lina Energy is the more current option on product relevance alone - its wattage range aligns with today's market norms and it addresses a wider range of use cases. ASM remains a niche proposition best suited to Australian customers who specifically value local assembly and are constrained by legacy system requirements. Neither brand is a practical substitute for established Tier 1 manufacturers when large-scale projects require non-recourse financing or bankability approval.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-26
Other brand comparisons
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.