ASM vs Einnova Solarline - solar panel manufacturer comparison
Einnova Solarline has the broader catalog (28 vs 1 models). Einnova Solarline leads on peak efficiency at 23.30%.
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
Australian Solar Manufacturing (ASM) is a small Australian solar panel assembler that produces crystalline monocrystalline modules domestically using components sourced from Germany, Japan, the USA, and China. The company focuses on providing locally assembled PV modules tailored to Australian conditions, supporting...
- Founded
- 2009
- Headquarters
- Hallam, Victoria, Australia
- Employees
- 1-10
Einnova Solarline Energy Corp. Limited, established in 2008, is a leading manufacturer of solar panels in China, offering conventional and flexible modules, BIPV products, and customized solutions. The company has a global presence in over 50 countries and has been ranked among China's Top 20 Solar Module...
- Founded
- 2008
- Headquarters
- Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
- Annual capacity
- 2 GW/year
- Employees
- 50+
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
Einnova Solarline skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+
Einnova Solarline offers more 600W+ panels (21% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (93%)
The flagships
Written summary
ASM, trading as Australian Solar Manufacturing Pty Ltd, is a small domestic manufacturer based in Keysborough, Victoria, Australia. The company has positioned itself as one of the few - if not the only - solar module producers with actual Australian assembly, targeting buyers who prioritize locally made goods. It is a niche player with no confirmed Tier 1 or BloombergNEF bankability status found in public sources, and its documented panel range reflects older, lower-wattage designs certified by TUV Rheinland to IEC 61215 and IEC 61730 standards. Einnova Solarline Energy Corp. Limited, by contrast, was founded in 2008 and is headquartered in Nanjing, China, operating as a dedicated solar division under the state-linked China Jiangsu International Group Ltd. The company reports a production capacity of around 2 GW across facilities in mainland China and Taiwan and claims an installed base exceeding 8 GW across more than 50 countries. No confirmed Tier 1 or BNEF listing was found for either brand in publicly accessible sources, but Einnova Solarline's scale and state-group backing give it a considerably stronger institutional footprint.
On the product side, ASM's publicly documented lineup consists of conventional crystalline modules in the sub-200 W range, which suits small rooftop retrofits but sits well behind the current market mainstream. Einnova Solarline offers a broader catalog spanning entry-level poly modules up through modern N-type TOPCon half-cut cells - including bifacial variants and models rated above 600 W - with peak efficiencies confirmed by datasheets at up to roughly 23.2%. This positions Einnova Solarline for residential rooftops, commercial flat roofs, and light utility-scale ground mounts alike. The company also carries a 30-year performance warranty, which is notably longer than what many mid-market peers offer.
For most buyers outside Australia in 2025, Einnova Solarline is the more practical default: it offers current-generation technology, a wider wattage range, international certifications including CE and INMETRO, and meaningful production scale. ASM's value proposition is almost entirely tied to Australian provenance - a legitimate purchasing criterion for some buyers, but one that comes with limited product choice and a smaller support network. Buyers for whom country-of-manufacture is the deciding factor may still find ASM relevant; everyone else will find Einnova Solarline the more capable and scalable option.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-15
Other brand comparisons
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.