AEET vs Hansol - solar panel manufacturer comparison
Hansol has the broader catalog (22 vs 5 models). Hansol leads on peak efficiency at 18.05%.
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
Hansol Group is a South Korean conglomerate (chaebol) with core operations in paper manufacturing, chemicals, logistics, IT solutions, and home decoration. The group was founded in 1965 and separated from Samsung Group in 1991. Hansol operates through a network of subsidiaries emphasizing innovation and sustainability.
- Founded
- 1965
- Headquarters
- Seoul, South Korea
- Annual capacity
- 0-1 GW/year
- Employees
- 11,000+
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (100%)
The flagships
Written summary
AEET Energy Group GmbH is a German photovoltaic company headquartered in Bad Gandersheim, Germany. Based on available sources, the company functions primarily as a wholesale distributor and installation-support partner rather than a large-scale panel manufacturer - it sells both third-party modules and its own branded mono- and polycrystalline products through a network of more than 500 certified specialist partners across Europe. No confirmed BloombergNEF Tier 1 manufacturing status for AEET itself was found in available research. Hansol, operated through Hansol Technics Co., Ltd., is a South Korean manufacturer whose parent group separated from Samsung in 1991 and established the solar-focused Technics subsidiary in 1996. Hansol carries a confirmed BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability designation and holds roughly 20% of the domestic Korean solar module market, with a European arm based in the Netherlands. On pure institutional footprint and independent bankability recognition, Hansol holds the stronger position.
The two brands address largely different parts of the market. AEET's proposition centers on European procurement logistics - flexible delivery quantities, broad product sourcing, and proximity to installers in the DACH region - rather than on a distinctive in-house cell technology. Hansol's own-brand catalog, as listed in the ENF Solar directory, spans PERC, bifacial, HJT, and TOPCon module families across a wide power output range, making it relevant for residential rooftop projects, commercial installations, and mid-scale ground-mounts alike.
For a typical buyer in 2025 who needs a directly bankable, technology-specific module with independent third-party validation, Hansol Technics is the more straightforward choice. AEET is better understood as a European distribution channel - useful for installers who want consolidated procurement of multiple brands - rather than a competing manufacturer in the conventional sense. The two are not really interchangeable: one is a manufacturer with confirmed Tier 1 status, the other is a wholesale partner that happens to sell its own-label panels alongside third-party product.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-15
Other brand comparisons
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.