Skip to main content
Home Tools Panel comparison calculator Report
30-year simulation report

A close run between eight modules

DXM8-72H-610 delivers 16,397 kWh over 30 years at 1.07 ¢/kWh, which makes its energy 15% cheaper per kilowatt-hour than the dearest module in this report. It is not the cheapest sticker price in the set - $130 is - and it still wins.

19 September 2026, 01:08 19c7cb90-3c04 Saved - link stays live
Download PDF
Best long-term value
Sun Earth DXM8-72H-610 610 Wp
  • Most energy produced. 16,397 kWh over 30 years, 538 kWh ahead of the next module.
  • Best composite in the set. It scores highest across lifetime energy, cost per kWh and warranty length taken together, even though it is not the cheapest energy in the set.
84 of 100
Cost per kWh 1.07 ¢/kWh
Ranking leader
DXM8-72H-610
Score 84 of 100
Highest 30-year yield
16,397 kWh
4,032 kWh above the lowest module
Lowest cost per kWh
1.03 ¢/kWh
18% cheaper than the dearest
Modules compared
8
Prices entered by the requester
Assumptions Cell temperature55 °C InstallationPitched, equator Baseline yield1,050 kWh/kWp Horizon30 years CurrencyUSD Change and re-run
01

Side by side

# Manufacturer / model Power Price Year 1 30-year Cost per kWh Score
1 Sun Earth DXM8-72H-610 610 Wp $175 579 16,397 1.07 ¢/kWh Most energy produced 84
2 JKM590N-72HL4-BDV 590 Wp $165 560 15,860 1.04 ¢/kWh 83
3 BiN-08-580 580 Wp $180 549 15,539 1.16 ¢/kWh 60
4 LR7-54HVH-480M 480 Wp $135 460 13,123 1.03 ¢/kWh Cheapest energy in the set 54
5 JAM54D40-460/LB 460 Wp $130 437 12,365 1.05 ¢/kWh 46
6 AIKO-A475-MAH54Mw 475 Wp $145 455 12,986 1.12 ¢/kWh 38
7 CS6.2-54TM-510 510 Wp $160 484 13,709 1.17 ¢/kWh 38
8 TSM-NEG9R.28 460W 460 Wp $155 437 12,365 1.25 ¢/kWh Weakest of the set 16
top 25% middle 50% bottom 25% Bands are relative to the modules in this report.

What drives each score

Each bar is the module's own composite, split into the three weighted parts that make it up. A dimension the whole set ties on separates nothing and splits evenly, and one they nearly tie on counts for nearly nothing.

DXM8-72H-610 84
JKM590N-72HL4-BDV 83
BiN-08-580 60
LR7-54HVH-480M 54
JAM54D40-460/LB 46
AIKO-A475-MAH54Mw 38
CS6.2-54TM-510 38
TSM-NEG9R.28 460W 16
30-year yield · 45%Cost per kWh · 40%Warranty · 15%
02

Where the difference comes from

Cumulative energy

Kilowatt-hours added up year by year. The gap widens with every year - by year 30 it is 4,032 kWh between the highest and lowest module.

Power remaining

Percentage of nameplate power still delivered, on each module's own datasheet curve. A module that holds its power longer is producing from a bigger number every year.

03

Method

Full methodology
How each figure is built
1 Annual yield Panel watts times the installation baseline of 1,050 kWh/kWp, times a temperature factor from the module's own coefficient at 55 °C, times whatever degradation has left that year.
2 Degradation Each module ages at its own datasheet rate - DXM8-72H-610 loses 1% in year one, then 0.4% a year. Where a manufacturer publishes no curve, the 2% / 0.55% convention is used.
3 Cost per kWh Offer price divided by the thirty annual yields added together. The only figure that lets a dearer module win, and often it does.
4 Score A 0-100 composite: lifetime energy 45%, cost per kWh 40%, warranty 15%, each normalised across this report's modules. A dimension they all tie on splits evenly.
What this does not model

Energy price inflation, inverter and installation cost, local irradiance and weather, shading, or degradation behaviour that differs from the datasheet curve. This report compares modules against each other, not a full system business case. Talk to an installer before you buy.

Sources
Panel specifications read from manufacturer datasheets, refreshed daily.
Prices entered by whoever generated this report - not quotes we obtained or verified.
Baseline yield from the installation type, overridable with PVGIS data.
Generated by ComparePV on 19 September 2026, 01:08 · report 19c7cb90-3c04 · anonymous and shareable Run a new comparison