Jinko Solar vs SpolarPV - solar panel manufacturer comparison
Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 62 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%.
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.
- Founded
- 2006
- Headquarters
- Shanghai, China
- Annual capacity
- 130.0 GW/year
- Employees
- 33,830
- Listed
- NYSE: JKS
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+
Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (41%)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (48%)
The flagships
Written summary
Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and headquartered in China, ranks among the largest solar module manufacturers in the world by shipment volume. Listed on the NYSE with over 33,000 employees and an annual production capacity of 130 GW, the company holds Tier 1 bankable status and has surpassed 300 GW of cumulative global installations across more than 100 countries. It has earned recognition as a PVEL Top Performer for eleven consecutive years, signaling consistent factory-to-field quality. SpolarPV is a considerably smaller Chinese manufacturer based in Nanjing, active since approximately 2010, with a production capacity estimated at around 800 MW. The company does not hold Tier 1 status, which limits its suitability for project-finance-backed installations, and independent third-party performance data remains scarce compared to its larger rivals.
Jinko Solar's 545-module portfolio is led by N-type TOPCon technology, achieving a maximum module efficiency of 24.8% and an average portfolio efficiency of 22.0%, with a temperature coefficient averaging -0.308%/°C - better than SpolarPV's -0.335%/°C. The Tiger Neo series in particular targets high-density residential rooftop installs and large utility-scale ground-mount systems alike, while an average warranty of 28.5 years reinforces long-term bankability for commercial C&I projects. SpolarPV's 64-module catalog is primarily PERC-based, with a maximum efficiency of 22.86% and an average of 21.1%. The company holds TUV, VDE, and CE certifications relevant to European markets and has documented installations in Poland and Norway, positioning itself mainly in the small-to-mid residential and light commercial segments. Its maximum output of 700 Wp and bifacial share of 26.6% indicate a product line that covers standard use cases without reaching the performance ceiling of Tier 1 competitors.
For international buyers requiring bankability, supply chain resilience, and broad service coverage - such as utility developers, institutional C&I buyers, or European distributors - Jinko Solar is the clear choice. SpolarPV may suit cost-sensitive buyers in smaller residential or off-grid projects where Tier 1 status and project financing are not prerequisites, but buyers should account for the significantly smaller production scale, the PERC-dominant portfolio in an industry rapidly transitioning to TOPCon, and the limited availability of independent long-term field performance data before committing to larger procurement volumes.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-12
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 173 Jinko Solar offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.