Skip to main content

Jinko Solar vs Runtech China - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Jinko Solar
China Founded 2006 Tier 1
Read the Jinko Solar review
VS
Runtech China
China Founded 2008
Read the Runtech China review
At a glance

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 21 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
637 21
Highest power
735 Wp 420 Wp
Best efficiency
24.8% 24.3%
Average efficiency
22.2% 18.6%
Bifacial share
36% 5%
Average warranty
29 yrs 25 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Jinko Solar

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Founded
2006
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Annual capacity
130.0 GW/year
Employees
33,830
Listed
NYSE: JKS
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Runtech China

Runtech Energy, founded in 2008, is a leading independent solar production supplier and designer. They are a trader of solar modules and PV project developer, with over 500MW of premium quality modules deployed worldwide. Runtech is committed to providing high-quality solar products and system integration services.

Founded
2008
Headquarters
Xi'an, China
Employees
50+
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Jinko Solar Runtech China
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 637+616 21
Max Power 735 W+315 W 420 W
Avg Power 523 W+222 W 301 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 24.80%+0.50 pp 24.30%
Avg Efficiency 22.18%+3.59 pp 18.59%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.304%/°C+0.045 -0.350%/°C
Bifacial Share 231 (36%)+32 pp 1 (5%)
Avg Warranty 28.7 yrs+3.7 yr 25.0 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)

Jinko Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (41%)

Runtech China cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture
04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Jinko Solar and Runtech China are both Chinese solar PV manufacturers, but they occupy fundamentally different positions in the global market. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and listed on the NYSE, is one of the world's largest solar module producers, with a module production capacity of 130 GW and a workforce of over 33,800 employees. The company holds Tier 1 bankable status and has consistently ranked among the top global module shippers, delivering approximately 99 GW of modules, cells and wafers in 2024 alone, representing roughly 13% of global market share. Runtech China, established in 2008, is a much smaller operation with just over 50 employees and a limited product portfolio of 21 panels. It holds no verified Tier 1 status, positioning it as a niche or budget-oriented supplier rather than a mainstream market player with the financial backing and supply chain depth that large-scale projects typically demand.

In terms of technology, Jinko Solar leads with a portfolio heavily oriented toward high-efficiency N-type TOPCon cells, which account for approximately 39% of its lineup. The company achieves a maximum module power of 735 Wp, a maximum panel efficiency of 24.8%, and an average efficiency of around 22.0%, supported by a favorable average temperature coefficient of Pmax at -0.308%/°C - indicating strong real-world performance across varying climate conditions. Nearly 32% of Jinko's portfolio consists of bifacial modules, making it well suited for utility-scale ground-mount installations, large commercial C&I projects, and residential rooftop installs where premium efficiency and long-term output guarantees are priorities. Runtech China's portfolio tops out at 420 Wp with an average efficiency of approximately 18.6% and a less competitive temperature coefficient of -0.350%/°C. With only 4.8% bifacial modules and unspecified cell technology across its entire range, Runtech's offering is better positioned for small off-grid applications or budget-sensitive projects where bankability and technology traceability are secondary concerns.

For international buyers and project developers evaluating both companies, Jinko Solar is the clear choice for any project requiring third-party financing, long-term warranty support averaging over 28 years, and a proven global supply chain. Runtech China may serve a limited role in very small or cost-driven contexts, but the lack of transparent cell technology disclosure, the small operational scale, and the absence of Tier 1 recognition make it a risky selection for projects where performance guarantees and bankability are essential criteria.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-12

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Runtech China
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Runtech China
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Runtech China
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 155 Jinko Solar offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.