Skip to main content

Jinko Solar vs Runergy New Energy - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Jinko Solar
China Founded 2006 Tier 1
Read the Jinko Solar review
VS
Runergy New Energy
China Founded 2013 Tier 1
Read the Runergy New Energy review
At a glance

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 0 models). Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
637 0
Highest power
735 Wp 0 Wp
Best efficiency
24.8% -
Average efficiency
22.2% -
Bifacial share
36% 0%
Average warranty
29 yrs -
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Jinko Solar

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Founded
2006
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Annual capacity
130.0 GW/year
Employees
33,830
Listed
NYSE: JKS
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Runergy New Energy

Runergy is an international PV technology company specializing in the research, development, manufacturing, and distribution of PV solar cells and modules. By the end of 2023, the company had shipped over 65 GW of solar cells. Runergy operates production facilities in China and overseas for polysilicon, wafers, cells...

Founded
2013
Headquarters
Yancheng, China
Annual capacity
63+ GW/year
Employees
15,000+
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Jinko Solar Runergy New Energy
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 637+637 0
Max Power 735 W+735 W 0 W
Avg Power 523 W+523 W 0 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 24.80% -
Avg Efficiency 22.18% -
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.304%/°C -
Bifacial Share 231 (36%)+36 pp 0 (0%)
Avg Warranty 28.7 yrs -

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)

Jinko Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (41%)

Runergy New Energy cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture
04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
Runergy New Energy all models
No panels from this manufacturer are in the database yet.
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Jinko Solar is a Chinese manufacturer founded in 2006 and headquartered in Shanghai, widely recognized as one of the largest solar module producers in the world. It has earned BloombergNEF's Tier 1 bankability designation for over ten consecutive years and, as of 2024, holds a 100% bankability rating - making it the only module maker to achieve that distinction - alongside an AAA rating in PV Tech's Q4 2024 bankability survey. By the end of 2025, the company targets an annual module production capacity of approximately 130 GW. Runergy New Energy - formally Jiangsu Runergy New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. - was founded in 2013 and is headquartered in Jiangsu province, China. It has secured BNEF Tier 1 status for six consecutive quarters since 2023 and operates cell manufacturing facilities in China, Thailand, and the United States (Huntsville, Alabama), with roughly 63 GW of global cell capacity and around 23 GW of planned module capacity. On institutional footprint and financing track record, Jinko Solar holds a commanding lead.

Both companies have pivoted their core product lines to N-type TOPCon technology. Jinko Solar's Tiger Neo series - now reaching a fifth-generation variant rated at up to 700 W with a module efficiency of approximately 25.9% as confirmed by PV Magazine - targets premium residential rooftops, large commercial installations, and utility-scale ground mounts. Runergy markets its modules under the Hyperion brand, covering bifacial residential and distributed commercial applications; its TOPCon module has been independently certified at a front-side efficiency above 24.9%, and its in-house R&D - conducted in partnership with Fraunhofer ISE and UNSW Australia - produced a 26.55% efficient M10 TOPCon cell certified by Germany's ISFH. Runergy ranked first in PV Magazine's bifacial module energy-yield test, a result that signals genuine performance credibility even if the brand remains less familiar to most buyers than Jinko.

For a typical buyer in 2025 - whether a residential installer, an independent power producer, or a procurement team financing a utility project - Jinko Solar is the lower-risk default. Its decade-long bankability record, global distribution network, and deep warranty infrastructure reduce lender and insurer friction that newer Tier 1 entrants still face. Runergy is a credible choice for cost-conscious buyers or those operating in markets where the company has established supply chains, and its cell-efficiency achievements suggest the technology gap is narrow. The two brands are not interchangeable at the procurement level, but the performance of their modules in the field is increasingly comparable.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-17

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Runergy New Energy
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Runergy New Energy
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Runergy New Energy
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 173 Jinko Solar offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.