Skip to main content

Jinko Solar vs Renesola - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Jinko Solar
China Founded 2006 Tier 1
Read the Jinko Solar review
VS
Renesola
China Founded 2005 Tier 1
Read the Renesola review
At a glance

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 115 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Renesola leans bifacial (61% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
637 115
Highest power
735 Wp 720 Wp
Best efficiency
24.8% 23.5%
Average efficiency
22.2% 21.7%
Bifacial share
36% 61%
Average warranty
29 yrs 30 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Jinko Solar

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Founded
2006
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Annual capacity
130.0 GW/year
Employees
33,830
Listed
NYSE: JKS
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Renesola

Renesola, established in 2005, is a pioneer in the global new energy field, committed to mitigating global warming and providing quality power station solutions for global clients. They offer one-stop solutions including development, financing, design, construction, operation, and maintenance, along with...

Founded
2005
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Annual capacity
16.5+ GW/year
Employees
100-500
Listed
NYSE: SOL
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Jinko Solar Renesola
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 637+522 115
Max Power 735 W+15 W 720 W
Avg Power 523 W+9 W 514 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 24.80%+1.29 pp 23.51%
Avg Efficiency 22.18%+0.51 pp 21.67%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.304%/°C -0.304%/°C+0.000
Bifacial Share 231 (36%) 70 (61%)+25 pp
Avg Warranty 28.7 yrs 29.7 yrs+1.0 yr

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Renesola offers more 600W+ panels (30% of lineup)

Jinko Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (41%)

Renesola cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>N-type</strong> (77%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Jinko Solar and Renesola are both Chinese-founded solar PV module manufacturers listed on the NYSE and holding Tier 1 bankable status according to BloombergNEF, yet they differ substantially in scale and market positioning. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and employing over 33,800 people, operates a module production capacity of 130 GW, establishing it as one of the world's largest solar manufacturers with a broad global footprint across utility, commercial, and residential segments. Renesola, founded one year earlier in 2005, operates at a considerably smaller scale with a stated production capacity of 16.5 GW and a lean workforce of 100 to 500 employees. Despite this size gap, Renesola has maintained continuous Tier 1 status and expanded its manufacturing presence across multiple countries, including facilities in China, Turkey, India, South Africa, and Taiwan, giving it meaningful geographic diversification relative to its size.

Jinko Solar's portfolio of 545 module models is one of the broadest in the industry, featuring a maximum power output of 735 Wp and a peak module efficiency of 24.8%, driven primarily by its N-type TOPCon cell technology - which accounts for roughly 39% of its catalog. With a bifacial module share of 31.9% and an average product warranty of approximately 28.5 years, Jinko is well suited to large utility-scale ground-mount projects, commercial C&I rooftop systems, and residential installations where brand recognition and supply chain depth are priorities. Renesola's narrower catalog of 115 models is more concentrated in N-type technology at 76.5% of its lineup, with a notably higher bifacial module share of 60.9%, making it a strong candidate for bifacial ground-mount, agrivoltaic, and performance-oriented installations. Its maximum module power reaches 720 Wp with a peak efficiency of 23.51% and a slightly longer average warranty of approximately 29.7 years.

For international buyers weighing the two, Jinko Solar is the lower-risk choice where supply continuity, catalog breadth, and global bankability are critical - particularly for large utility-scale or diversified multi-market procurement. Renesola offers a focused, technology-consistent alternative with a high bifacial ratio that suits buyers who prioritize long-term yield performance and are comfortable working with a leaner but still Tier 1-rated supplier. In either case, verifying local distributor support and after-sales service infrastructure in the target market is advisable before committing to either brand.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-09

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Renesola
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Renesola
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Renesola
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 171 Jinko Solar offers · See 1 Renesola offer

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.