Skip to main content

Jinko Solar vs Q-SUN Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Jinko Solar
China Founded 2006 Tier 1
Read the Jinko Solar review
VS
Q-SUN Solar
China Founded 2014
Read the Q-SUN Solar review
At a glance

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 111 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Q-SUN Solar leans bifacial (68% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
637 111
Highest power
735 Wp 730 Wp
Best efficiency
24.8% 23.7%
Average efficiency
22.2% 21.9%
Bifacial share
36% 68%
Average warranty
29 yrs 29 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Jinko Solar

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Founded
2006
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Annual capacity
130.0 GW/year
Employees
33,830
Listed
NYSE: JKS
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Q-SUN Solar

Qn-SOLAR officially launched its global PV business in 2022. The company is headquartered in Shanghai, China, and has four manufacturing bases in China. As a professional and integrated company, Qn-SOLAR operates in various fields of PV upstream and downstream, achieving an annual production capacity of 20GW PV cells...

Founded
2014
Headquarters
China
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Jinko Solar Q-SUN Solar
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 637+526 111
Max Power 735 W+5 W 730 W
Avg Power 523 W 543 W+20 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 24.80%+1.10 pp 23.70%
Avg Efficiency 22.18%+0.27 pp 21.91%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.304%/°C -0.303%/°C+0.001
Bifacial Share 231 (36%) 76 (68%)+32 pp
Avg Warranty 28.7 yrs+0.0 yr 28.7 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Q-SUN Solar offers more 600W+ panels (30% of lineup)

Jinko Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (41%)

Q-SUN Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>N-type</strong> (42%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Jinko Solar and Q-SUN Solar represent two very different tiers of the global solar manufacturing landscape. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and headquartered in China, is listed on the NYSE and employs over 33,800 people, with a production capacity of 130 GW - placing it among the world's largest PV module manufacturers by volume. The company holds Tier 1 (bankable) status, independently verified by leading financial institutions, and has accumulated over 300 GW of cumulative global shipments. Q-SUN Solar, established in 2014 in Chuzhou, China, operates at a considerably smaller scale - estimated at several gigawatts of annual capacity - and does not hold Tier 1 status. Its product catalog covers 114 panel models compared to Jinko's 545, reflecting the difference in portfolio breadth. In terms of technology, Jinko leads with a maximum efficiency of 24.8% and a peak power of 735 Wp, anchored by its Tiger Neo TOPCon series, which accounts for 39.4% of its portfolio. Q-SUN's top cell technology is N-type, making up 41.2% of its range, with a maximum efficiency of 23.7% and peak power of 730 Wp. Notably, Q-SUN's average panel power (approximately 545.7 Wp) exceeds Jinko's (approximately 511 Wp), and Q-SUN has a markedly higher share of bifacial modules - 66.7% versus 31.9% for Jinko.

For residential rooftop installations, Jinko Solar is a well-proven choice backed by extensive installer networks, reliable spare part availability, and strong European market presence. Its Tier 1 status makes it the preferred option for utility-scale ground-mount projects that require project finance or bank guarantees. The Tiger Neo TOPCon lineup delivers high efficiency with low degradation rates, making it competitive across both residential and commercial C&I segments. Q-SUN Solar, with its high bifacial ratio and a slightly better average temperature coefficient (-0.304%/°C versus -0.308%/°C for Jinko), is better suited for open-field installations where rear-side irradiance is significant - such as agrivoltaic projects or large ground-mount arrays in high-irradiance environments. Its higher average power per panel can also be attractive in space-constrained commercial rooftop scenarios.

For international buyers, Jinko Solar is the lower-risk choice due to its scale, bankability, proven track record, and ease of obtaining long-term service and warranty support globally. Q-SUN may appeal to cost-conscious buyers seeking bifacial-heavy portfolios in the mid-market segment, but due diligence on warranty enforcement, local service availability, and financial stability is strongly recommended before committing to large-scale procurement.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-09

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Q-SUN Solar
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Q-SUN Solar
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Q-SUN Solar
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 171 Jinko Solar offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.