Skip to main content

Jinko Solar vs Motech - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Jinko Solar
China Founded 2006 Tier 1
Read the Jinko Solar review
VS
Motech
Taiwan Founded 1981
Read the Motech review
At a glance

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 28 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
637 28
Highest power
735 Wp 590 Wp
Best efficiency
24.8% 22.9%
Average efficiency
22.2% 20.1%
Bifacial share
36% 11%
Average warranty
29 yrs 25 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Jinko Solar

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Founded
2006
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Annual capacity
130.0 GW/year
Employees
33,830
Listed
NYSE: JKS
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Motech

Motech Industries Inc. is dedicated to the research, development, and manufacture of high-quality solar products and services, ranging from photovoltaic (PV) cells, PV modules, to PV power systems. The company has evolved from a test and measurement instruments designer and manufacturer to a full-service global solar...

Founded
1981
Headquarters
Tainan City, Taiwan
Annual capacity
1.2+ GW/year
Employees
2,340
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Jinko Solar Motech
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 637+609 28
Max Power 735 W+145 W 590 W
Avg Power 523 W+102 W 421 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 24.80%+1.90 pp 22.90%
Avg Efficiency 22.18%+2.08 pp 20.10%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.304%/°C+0.056 -0.360%/°C
Bifacial Share 231 (36%)+26 pp 3 (11%)
Avg Warranty 28.7 yrs+3.7 yr 25.0 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)

Jinko Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (41%)

Motech cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>N-type</strong> (11%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Jinko Solar and Motech represent fundamentally different scales and strategic positions within the global solar PV industry. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and headquartered in China, employs over 33,830 people and operates a production capacity of 130 GW per year, making it one of the world's largest integrated solar module manufacturers. Listed on the NYSE and holding Tier 1 (bankable) status, Jinko is fully accepted by major financial institutions for large-scale renewable energy project financing. Its catalog of 545 module models centers on N-type TOPCon cell technology, which accounts for approximately 39.4% of the portfolio, with a maximum module efficiency of 24.8%, peak output of 735 Wp, and an average module power of around 511 Wp. Motech, founded in 1981 and headquartered in Taiwan, employs approximately 2,340 people and reports a production capacity of over 1.2 GW. Listed on the Taipei Exchange (TPEX), the company operates primarily as a solar cell manufacturer rather than a finished module supplier - no module-level technical specifications are available for Motech in the dataset reviewed.

Jinko Solar's broad product range makes it suitable across virtually all installation segments. High-wattage bifacial models - bifacial variants represent nearly 32% of its portfolio - deliver strong energy yields on utility-scale ground-mount projects, while the wide selection of formats accommodates residential rooftop installs on pitched roofs and commercial and industrial (C&I) rooftop systems where space efficiency matters. An average product warranty of approximately 28.5 years and a low average temperature coefficient of around -0.308%/°C per degree further support long-term performance predictability. Motech, by contrast, has directed its R&D efforts toward next-generation tandem solar cells with projected efficiencies of 28-30%, with mass production targeted for 2025. This positions Motech primarily as a cell technology supplier or research partner for module manufacturers, rather than a direct source of ready-to-install panels for end-market buyers.

For international buyers choosing between the two, Jinko Solar is the clear practical choice for immediate procurement across residential, commercial, and utility-scale segments, backed by a global supply chain, Tier 1 bankability, and a well-documented and diverse product portfolio. Motech's relevance is concentrated at the upstream cell and technology development level, making it a more compelling partner for OEM cell sourcing or advanced R&D collaboration than for standard panel procurement.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-12

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Motech
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Motech
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Motech
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 171 Jinko Solar offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.