DMEGC vs Vikram Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison
Vikram Solar has the broader catalog (202 vs 150 models). Vikram Solar leads on peak efficiency at 23.69%.
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
DMEGC Solar, founded in 1980, is a global provider of renewable energy solutions, specializing in high-efficiency solar panels for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. The company has six manufacturing bases and is known for its integrated supply chain, from wafers to modules. DMEGC Solar is committed...
- Founded
- 1980
- Headquarters
- Dongyang, Zhejiang Province, China
- Annual capacity
- 21 GW/year
- Employees
- 18,831
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Vikram Solar Limited is a leading Indian solar photovoltaic (PV) module manufacturer and solar solutions provider. They offer engineering, procurement, construction (EPC), and operations & maintenance (O&M) services for solar plants. The company manufactures high-efficiency solar PV modules and has a pan-India...
- Founded
- 2005
- Headquarters
- Kolkata, India
- Annual capacity
- 9.5 GW/year
- Employees
- 1,895
- Listed
- NSE, BSE: VIKRAMSOLR
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
DMEGC skews to higher efficiency: 21% of lineup is 23%+
Vikram Solar offers more 600W+ panels (42% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (73%)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (75%)
The flagships
Written summary
DMEGC is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Hengdian, Zhejiang Province, operating as a subsidiary of the diversified Hengdian Group. Originally rooted in electronics and magnetic materials, DMEGC expanded into photovoltaics and has grown into one of the world's largest solar module producers. The company holds Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 status and, as of September 2025, was included in S&P Global's inaugural Tier 1 Cleantech Company list. Annual production capacity stands at 23 GW of cells and 21 GW of modules, with first-half 2025 shipments reaching 13.4 GW - a 64% year-on-year increase - placing DMEGC fifth in Wood Mackenzie's 2025 global module manufacturer rankings. Vikram Solar, by contrast, is an Indian manufacturer founded in 2006 and headquartered in Kolkata. It re-entered the Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 list in 2024 and commands total production capacity of approximately 9.5 GW following the commissioning of its state-of-the-art Vallam facility in Tamil Nadu. Vikram Solar operates across more than 32 countries and maintains a US domestic manufacturing presence. On institutional footprint and sheer throughput, DMEGC holds the stronger position.
Both manufacturers have made N-type TOPCon their primary cell technology. DMEGC's portfolio spans utility-scale ground-mount projects and residential rooftop installations alike - the company released lightweight bifacial TOPCon panels designed for retrofitting onto existing roof structures, and its Infinity RT TOPCon module reached 23.5% efficiency and 635 W output by late 2025. Vikram Solar's Hypersol series covers N-type TOPCon bifacial modules in G12 and M10 cell formats, with large-format utility panels exceeding 700 W, while the Paradea series retains Mono PERC bifacial options for cost-sensitive applications. Both brands address the full range from residential rooftop through commercial and industrial (C&I) to utility-scale ground-mount.
For international buyers prioritising supply security and proven bankability, DMEGC is the more straightforward default given its top-five global ranking and production scale. Vikram Solar is a credible alternative for buyers seeking geographic supply-chain diversification away from China, or for projects in markets where Indian-manufactured modules carry preferential tariff treatment - most notably the United States. In purely technical terms the two brands are closely matched, and selecting one over the other is largely a procurement strategy decision rather than a quality judgment.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-07-16
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 82 DMEGC offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.