Skip to main content

DAH Solar vs Yingli - solar panel manufacturer comparison

DAH Solar
China Founded 2009 Tier 1
Read the DAH Solar review
VS
Yingli
China Founded 1998 Tier 1
Read the Yingli review
At a glance

DAH Solar has the broader catalog (363 vs 196 models). Yingli leads on peak efficiency at 24.10%. DAH Solar leans bifacial (87% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
363 196
Highest power
725 Wp 735 Wp
Best efficiency
23.3% 24.1%
Average efficiency
22.1% 21.3%
Bifacial share
87% 57%
Average warranty
29 yrs 28 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
DAH Solar

DAH Solar is an innovation-driven and technology-leading company specializing in PV product manufacturing. They focus on R&D, manufacturing, and sales of high-efficiency PV modules, integrated PV systems, and solar energy storage systems. DAH Solar is known for its patented Full-Screen PV Module and SolarUnit...

Founded
2009
Headquarters
Hefei, China
Annual capacity
10 GW/year
Employees
2000+
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Yingli

Yingli Solar, also known as Yingli Green Energy, is a leading solar energy company and one of the world's largest vertically integrated PV manufacturers. The company develops, manufactures, and sells PV modules to a wide range of markets. Yingli's mission is to provide affordable green energy for all.

Founded
1998
Headquarters
Baoding, Hebei, China
Annual capacity
2.45 GW/year
Employees
9000+
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric DAH Solar Yingli
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 363+167 196
Max Power 725 W 735 W+10 W
Avg Power 520 W 524 W+4 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 23.34% 24.10%+0.76 pp
Avg Efficiency 22.10%+0.83 pp 21.28%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.299%/°C+0.032 -0.330%/°C
Bifacial Share 316 (87%)+30 pp 112 (57%)
Avg Warranty 29.4 yrs+1.5 yr 27.9 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Yingli skews to higher efficiency: 21% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Yingli offers more 600W+ panels (37% of lineup)

DAH Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (88%)

Yingli cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (32%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

DAH Solar and Yingli are both Chinese Tier 1 solar module manufacturers, but they differ substantially in trajectory, scale, and technology maturity. DAH Solar, founded in 2009, has grown rapidly to a production capacity of 10 GW and distributes its products to more than 120 countries, with Europe and Latin America as key markets - it secured its place on the BNEF Q1 2025 Tier 1 list and employs over 2,000 people. Yingli, founded in 1998 and once among the world's largest module makers with cumulative shipments exceeding 24 GW, went through severe financial distress and judicial restructuring in the mid-2010s; today it retains Tier 1 bankability but operates at a substantially reduced production capacity of 2.45 GW and its shares trade on the OTC Pink market following delisting from the NYSE. The contrast in company health is a critical differentiator for buyers evaluating long-term warranty security.

Technologically, DAH Solar has committed decisively to n-type TOPCon, which accounts for 79.61% of its portfolio, and 87% of its panels are bifacial - a combination that delivers an average module efficiency of 22.10% and a notably favorable average temperature coefficient of -0.299%/°C, along with an average product warranty of 29.4 years. This makes DAH Solar a strong choice for residential rooftop installations, commercial C&I projects, and ground-mount systems where consistent energy yield under variable temperatures matters. Yingli's portfolio is still dominated by PERC technology (32.14%), with TOPCon adoption growing but not yet dominant; average efficiency stands at 21.28% with a higher temperature coefficient of -0.330%/°C and 57% bifacial coverage. Yingli's peak power output reaches 735 Wp, marginally higher than DAH Solar's 725 Wp, which may appeal to utility-scale buyers seeking high-density installations.

For international buyers choosing between the two, DAH Solar currently presents the more technically consistent and financially stable proposition - its modern TOPCon-dominant lineup, higher average efficiency, better thermal performance, and longer average warranty make it suitable for both residential and commercial buyers who prioritize reliability. Yingli remains a viable option in cost-sensitive or large-scale procurement scenarios, but prospective buyers should conduct thorough due diligence on its financial standing and supply chain continuity before committing to a long-term sourcing agreement.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-12

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
DAH Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Yingli
Manufacturers
DAH Solar AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Yingli
Manufacturers
DAH Solar AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Yingli
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 11 DAH Solar offers · See 7 Yingli offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.