Waaree WSM-395 vs Waaree WS-350
VS
The verdict
WSM-395 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 2.26 pp more efficient. 8 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 10 differencesHow alike are they
8
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
10 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
WSM-395
WS-350
Difference
Module efficiency
19.83 %
17.57 %
2.26 pp more efficient
Rated power
395 Wp
350 Wp
45 W more power
Power density
198.4 Wp/m²
175.8 Wp/m²
22.6 Wp/m² higher
Weight per kWp
54.4 kg/kWp
61.4 kg/kWp
7.0 kg/kWp lighter
Temperature coefficient
-0.370 %/°C
-0.386 %/°C
0.016 %/°C better in heat
Open-circuit voltage
49.05 V
47.10 V
1.95 V apart
Short-circuit current
10.12 A
9.45 A
0.67 A apart
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Polycrystalline
Monocrystalline vs Polycrystalline
Current at max power
9.81 A
9.00 A
0.81 A apart
Voltage at max power
40.28 V
38.90 V
1.38 V apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
WSM-395
12,350 kWh
WS-350
11,006 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,344 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
WSM-395
WS-350
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
395 W
350 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.2% of rated power
373 W
330 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
88.4% of rated power
351 W
309 W
Hot roof
70 °C
82.6% of rated power
329 W
289 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
WSM-395
WS-350
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
395 Wp
350 Wp
+45 W for WSM-395
Module efficiency
19.83 %
17.57 %
+2.26 pp for WSM-395
Power density
198.4 Wp/m²
175.8 Wp/m²
+22.6 Wp/m² for WSM-395
Open-circuit voltage
49.05 V
47.10 V
1.95 V apart
Voltage at max power
40.28 V
38.90 V
1.38 V apart
Short-circuit current
10.12 A
9.45 A
0.67 A apart
Current at max power
9.81 A
9.00 A
0.81 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.370 %/°C
-0.386 %/°C
+0.016 %/°C for WSM-395
Mechanical
Dimensions
1985x1003x35 mm
1985x1003x35 mm
Same
Module area
1.991 m²
1.991 m²
Same
Weight
21.5 kg
21.5 kg
Same
Weight per kWp
54.4 kg/kWp
61.4 kg/kWp
-7.0 kg/kWp for WSM-395
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
10 yrs
10 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
25 yrs
25 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.70 %/yr
0.70 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
PERC
-
Not published by Waaree
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Polycrystalline
Monocrystalline vs Polycrystalline
Cell count
72
72
Same
Bifacial
No
No
Same
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#12,497
vs
#13,435
WSM-395 leads by 938 places
Power density
#12,472
vs
#13,416
WSM-395 leads by 944 places
Heat behaviour
#13,161
vs
#13,565
WSM-395 leads by 404 places
Weight
#8,811
vs
#12,739
WSM-395 leads by 3,928 places
Warranty
#9,912
vs
#9,912
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#12,611
vs
#13,359
WSM-395 leads by 748 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Waaree WSM-395 vs Waaree WSM-390
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Waaree WSM-395 vs Waaree WSM-385
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Waaree WSM-395 vs Waaree WSM-380
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Waaree WSM-395 vs Waaree WS-345
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Waaree WSM-395 vs Waaree WS-340
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Waaree WSM-395 vs Waaree WS-335
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Waaree WSM-395 or Waaree WS-350?
According to our database: Waaree WSM-395 has higher module efficiency (19.83% vs 17.57%); Waaree WSM-395 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.370%/°C vs -0.386%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Waaree WSM-395 and Waaree WS-350?
Waaree WSM-395 has a module efficiency of 19.83%, while Waaree WS-350 is 17.57%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Waaree WSM-395 use vs Waaree WS-350?
Waaree WSM-395 uses PERC cells; Waaree WS-350 uses Polycrystalline. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Waaree WSM-395 and Waaree WS-350?
Waaree WSM-395 has a 25 years power warranty; Waaree WS-350 has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Shop prices: See 25 Waaree offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.