Skip to main content
610 vs 635 14 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Waaree BiN-21-610 vs Waaree BiN-21-635

BiN-21-610
610 Wp 22.58 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page
VS
BiN-21-635
635 Wp 23.51 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page
The verdict

635 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.93 pp more efficient. 14 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 5 differences
How alike are they
14 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

5 of 19 parameters
Parameter 610 635 Difference
Module efficiency 22.58 % 23.51 % 0.93 pp more efficient
Power density 225.8 Wp/m² 235.1 Wp/m² 9.3 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 610 Wp 635 Wp 25 W more power
Weight per kWp 55.4 kg/kWp 53.2 kg/kWp 2.2 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage 48.70 V 49.70 V 1.00 V apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Declared annual degradation, with a 1.0% first-year loss assumed for both panels because at least one datasheet omits it, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
610
20,467 kWh
635
21,306 kWh
Lifetime gap
839 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 610 635
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 610 W 635 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 583 W 606 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 555 W 578 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 528 W 549 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 610 635 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 610 Wp 635 Wp +25 W for 635
Module efficiency 22.58 % 23.51 % +0.93 pp for 635
Power density 225.8 Wp/m² 235.1 Wp/m² +9.3 Wp/m² for 635
Open-circuit voltage 48.70 V 49.70 V 1.00 V apart
Voltage at max power 40.94 V 41.91 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 15.92 A 16.17 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 14.90 A 15.15 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.300 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2382x1134x35 mm 2382x1134x35 mm Same
Module area 2.701 m² 2.701 m² Same
Weight 33.8 kg 33.8 kg Same
Weight per kWp 55.4 kg/kWp 53.2 kg/kWp -2.2 kg/kWp for 635
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

13,953 panels
Efficiency
#3,783 vs #688
635 leads by 3,095 places
Power density
#3,685 vs #731
635 leads by 2,954 places
Heat behaviour
#6,051 vs #6,051
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#9,781 vs #7,029
635 leads by 2,752 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,314 vs #1,743
635 leads by 1,571 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Waaree BiN-21-610 vs Waaree BiN-21-630
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Waaree BiN-21-610 vs Waaree BiN-21-625
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Waaree BiN-21-610 vs Waaree BiN-21-620
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Waaree BiN-21-610 vs Waaree BiN-21-615
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Waaree BiN-21-610 vs Waaree BiN-21-605
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Waaree BiN-21-610 vs Waaree BiN-21-600
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Waaree BiN-21-610 or Waaree BiN-21-635?
According to our database: Waaree BiN-21-635 has higher module efficiency (23.51% vs 22.58%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Waaree BiN-21-610 and Waaree BiN-21-635?
Waaree BiN-21-610 has a module efficiency of 22.58%, while Waaree BiN-21-635 is 23.51%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Waaree BiN-21-610 use vs Waaree BiN-21-635?
Waaree BiN-21-610 uses TOPCon cells; Waaree BiN-21-635 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Waaree BiN-21-610 and Waaree BiN-21-635?
Waaree BiN-21-610 has a 30 years power warranty; Waaree BiN-21-635 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Waaree BiN-21-610 and Waaree BiN-21-635 bifacial panels?
Both Waaree BiN-21-610 and Waaree BiN-21-635 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 28 Waaree offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.