Skip to main content
BiN-08-560 vs TP585LG10B 4 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Waaree BiN-08-560 vs Tata Power Solar TP585LG10B

BiN-08-560
560 Wp 21.67 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Tata Power Solar TP585LG10B
Tata Power Solar
TP585LG10B
585 Wp 21.00 % PERC Bifacial
The verdict

BiN-08-560 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.070 %/°C better in heat. 4 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 15 differences
How alike are they
4 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

15 of 19 parameters
Parameter BiN-08-560 TP585LG10B Difference
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.370 %/°C 0.070 %/°C better in heat
Module efficiency 21.67 % 21.00 % 0.67 pp more efficient
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.60 %/yr 0.20 %/yr slower
Weight 32.0 kg 36.0 kg 4.0 kg lighter
Rated power 560 Wp 585 Wp 25 W more power
Power density 216.7 Wp/m² 210.0 Wp/m² 6.6 Wp/m² higher
Module area 2.584 m² 2.785 m² 0.201 m² apart
Weight per kWp 57.1 kg/kWp 61.5 kg/kWp 4.4 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage 50.70 V 53.73 V 3.03 V apart
Cell technology TOPCon PERC TOPCon vs PERC
Voltage at max power 42.00 V 46.10 V 4.10 V apart
Cell count 144 156 12 cells apart
Short-circuit current 14.11 A 13.20 A 0.91 A apart
Dimensions 2279x1134x35 mm 2456x1134x35 mm 2279x1134x35 mm vs 2456x1134x35 mm
Current at max power 13.34 A 12.69 A 0.65 A apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
BiN-08-560
18,789 kWh
TP585LG10B
18,701 kWh
Lifetime gap
88 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario BiN-08-560 TP585LG10B
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 560 W 585 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.5% of rated power 535 W 553 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 88.9% of rated power 510 W 520 W
Hot roof 70 °C 83.3% of rated power 484 W 488 W
03

Full specification

Parameter BiN-08-560 TP585LG10B Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 560 Wp 585 Wp +25 W for TP585LG10B
Module efficiency 21.67 % 21.00 % +0.67 pp for BiN-08-560
Power density 216.7 Wp/m² 210.0 Wp/m² +6.6 Wp/m² for BiN-08-560
Open-circuit voltage 50.70 V 53.73 V 3.03 V apart
Voltage at max power 42.00 V 46.10 V 4.10 V apart
Short-circuit current 14.11 A 13.20 A 0.91 A apart
Current at max power 13.34 A 12.69 A 0.65 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.370 %/°C +0.070 %/°C for BiN-08-560
Mechanical
Dimensions 2279x1134x35 mm 2456x1134x35 mm 2279x1134x35 mm vs 2456x1134x35 mm
Module area 2.584 m² 2.785 m² 0.201 m² apart
Weight 32.0 kg 36.0 kg -4.0 kg for BiN-08-560
Weight per kWp 57.1 kg/kWp 61.5 kg/kWp -4.4 kg/kWp for BiN-08-560
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.60 %/yr -0.20 %/yr for BiN-08-560
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon PERC TOPCon vs PERC
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 156 12 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#7,652 vs #9,828
BiN-08-560 leads by 2,176 places
Power density
#7,602 vs #9,836
BiN-08-560 leads by 2,234 places
Heat behaviour
#6,152 vs #13,161
BiN-08-560 leads by 7,009 places
Weight
#11,138 vs #12,756
BiN-08-560 leads by 1,618 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#6,166 vs #6,113
TP585LG10B leads by 53 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Waaree BiN-08-560 vs Waaree BiN-08-555
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Waaree BiN-08-560 vs Waaree BiN-08-550
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Waaree BiN-08-560 vs Waaree BiN-08-545
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tata Power Solar
Tata Power Solar TP585LG10B vs Tata Power Solar TP642LG10B
8 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tata Power Solar
Tata Power Solar TP585LG10B vs Tata Power Solar TP637LG10B
8 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tata Power Solar
Tata Power Solar TP585LG10B vs Tata Power Solar TP631LG10B
7 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Waaree BiN-08-560 or Tata Power Solar TP585LG10B?
According to our database: Waaree BiN-08-560 has higher module efficiency (21.67% vs 21.00%); Waaree BiN-08-560 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.300%/°C vs -0.370%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Waaree BiN-08-560 and Tata Power Solar TP585LG10B?
Waaree BiN-08-560 has a module efficiency of 21.67%, while Tata Power Solar TP585LG10B is 21.00%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Waaree BiN-08-560 use vs Tata Power Solar TP585LG10B?
Waaree BiN-08-560 uses TOPCon cells; Tata Power Solar TP585LG10B uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Waaree BiN-08-560 and Tata Power Solar TP585LG10B?
Waaree BiN-08-560 has a 30 years power warranty; Tata Power Solar TP585LG10B has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Waaree BiN-08-560 and Tata Power Solar TP585LG10B bifacial panels?
Both Waaree BiN-08-560 and Tata Power Solar TP585LG10B are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Compare Waaree and Tata Power Solar as manufacturers Portfolio, efficiency, cell technologies and warranty terms

Shop prices: See 26 Waaree offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.