Skip to main content
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 vs HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.630.05 6 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.630.05

Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05
Vikram Solar
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05
735 Wp 23.66 % HJT Bifacial
VS
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.630.05
Vikram Solar
HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.630.05
630 Wp 22.62 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.04 pp more efficient. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 13 differences
How alike are they
6 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

13 of 19 parameters
Parameter SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.630.05 Difference
Module efficiency 23.66 % 22.62 % 1.04 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.300 %/°C 0.040 %/°C better in heat
Rated power 735 Wp 630 Wp 105 W more power
Power density 236.6 Wp/m² 226.2 Wp/m² 10.4 Wp/m² higher
Weight 39.5 kg 35.0 kg 4.5 kg lighter
Short-circuit current 17.82 A 14.24 A 3.58 A apart
Module area 3.106 m² 2.785 m² 0.321 m² apart
Open-circuit voltage 51.60 V 55.30 V 3.70 V apart
Cell technology HJT TOPCon HJT vs TOPCon
Current at max power 17.04 A 13.55 A 3.49 A apart
Cell count 132 156 24 cells apart
Voltage at max power 43.20 V 46.51 V 3.31 V apart
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2456x1134x35 mm 2384x1303x35 mm vs 2456x1134x35 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05
24,737 kWh
HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.630.05
21,138 kWh
Lifetime gap
3,599 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.630.05
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 735 W 630 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 706 W 602 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 678 W 573 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 649 W 545 W
03

Full specification

Parameter SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.630.05 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 735 Wp 630 Wp +105 W for SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05
Module efficiency 23.66 % 22.62 % +1.04 pp for SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05
Power density 236.6 Wp/m² 226.2 Wp/m² +10.4 Wp/m² for SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05
Open-circuit voltage 51.60 V 55.30 V 3.70 V apart
Voltage at max power 43.20 V 46.51 V 3.31 V apart
Short-circuit current 17.82 A 14.24 A 3.58 A apart
Current at max power 17.04 A 13.55 A 3.49 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.300 %/°C +0.040 %/°C for SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2456x1134x35 mm 2384x1303x35 mm vs 2456x1134x35 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 2.785 m² 0.321 m² apart
Weight 39.5 kg 35.0 kg -4.5 kg for HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.630.05
Weight per kWp 53.7 kg/kWp 55.6 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.38 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Effectively the same
Technology
Cell technology HJT TOPCon HJT vs TOPCon
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 156 24 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#634 vs #3,693
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 leads by 3,059 places
Power density
#614 vs #3,739
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 leads by 3,125 places
Heat behaviour
#515 vs #6,152
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 leads by 5,637 places
Weight
#7,848 vs #9,992
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 leads by 2,144 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#247 vs #2,645
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 leads by 2,398 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.720.05
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.630.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.625.05
The same specification on paper
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 or Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.630.05?
According to our database: Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 has higher module efficiency (23.66% vs 22.62%); Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.630.05?
Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 has a module efficiency of 23.66%, while Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.630.05 is 22.62%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 use vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.630.05?
Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 uses HJT cells; Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.630.05 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.630.05?
Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 has a 30 years power warranty; Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.630.05 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.630.05 bifacial panels?
Both Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.78.630.05 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.