Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-675 vs Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.550.05
VS
The verdict
66.AAA.05-675 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is rated power: 125 W more power. 8 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 11 differencesHow alike are they
8
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
11 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
66.AAA.05-675
72.550.05
Difference
Rated power
675 Wp
550 Wp
125 W more power
Weight
39.5 kg
32.5 kg
7.0 kg lighter
Module efficiency
21.73 %
21.29 %
0.44 pp more efficient
Short-circuit current
18.17 A
13.82 A
4.35 A apart
Module area
3.106 m²
2.583 m²
0.523 m² apart
Open-circuit voltage
46.70 V
49.70 V
3.00 V apart
Power density
217.3 Wp/m²
212.9 Wp/m²
4.4 Wp/m² higher
Current at max power
17.27 A
13.14 A
4.13 A apart
Cell count
132
144
12 cells apart
Voltage at max power
39.10 V
41.90 V
2.80 V apart
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2278x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x35 mm vs 2278x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.350 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
66.AAA.05-675
22,052 kWh
72.550.05
17,969 kWh
Lifetime gap
4,083 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
66.AAA.05-675
72.550.05
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
675 W
550 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.8% of rated power
640 W
521 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.5% of rated power
604 W
492 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.2% of rated power
569 W
463 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
66.AAA.05-675
72.550.05
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
675 Wp
550 Wp
+125 W for 66.AAA.05-675
Module efficiency
21.73 %
21.29 %
+0.44 pp for 66.AAA.05-675
Power density
217.3 Wp/m²
212.9 Wp/m²
+4.4 Wp/m² for 66.AAA.05-675
Open-circuit voltage
46.70 V
49.70 V
3.00 V apart
Voltage at max power
39.10 V
41.90 V
2.80 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.17 A
13.82 A
4.35 A apart
Current at max power
17.27 A
13.14 A
4.13 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.350 %/°C
-0.350 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2278x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x35 mm vs 2278x1134x30 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
2.583 m²
0.523 m² apart
Weight
39.5 kg
32.5 kg
-7.0 kg for 72.550.05
Weight per kWp
58.5 kg/kWp
59.1 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.50 %/yr
0.50 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
PERC
PERC
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
144
12 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#7,434
vs
#8,776
66.AAA.05-675 leads by 1,342 places
Power density
#7,413
vs
#8,563
66.AAA.05-675 leads by 1,150 places
Heat behaviour
#10,489
vs
#10,489
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#11,862
vs
#12,099
66.AAA.05-675 leads by 237 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,222
vs
#7,059
66.AAA.05-675 leads by 4,837 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-675 vs Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-680
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-675 vs Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-675 vs Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-670
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-675 vs Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-665
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-675 vs Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-660
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-675 vs Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-655
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-675 or Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.550.05?
According to our database: Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-675 has higher module efficiency (21.73% vs 21.29%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-675 and Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.550.05?
Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-675 has a module efficiency of 21.73%, while Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.550.05 is 21.29%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-675 use vs Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.550.05?
Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-675 uses PERC cells; Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.550.05 uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-675 and Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.550.05?
Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-675 has a 30 years power warranty; Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.550.05 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-675 and Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.550.05 bifacial panels?
Both Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-675 and Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.550.05 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.
