Skip to main content
66.AAA.05-670 vs 72.550.05 9 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-670 vs Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.550.05

Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-670
Vikram Solar
PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-670
670 Wp 21.57 % PERC Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Vikram Solar
PARADEA VSMDH.72.550.05
550 Wp 21.29 % PERC Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

66.AAA.05-670 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 120 W more power. 9 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 10 differences
How alike are they
9 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

10 of 19 parameters
Parameter 66.AAA.05-670 72.550.05 Difference
Rated power 670 Wp 550 Wp 120 W more power
Weight 39.5 kg 32.5 kg 7.0 kg lighter
Short-circuit current 18.11 A 13.82 A 4.29 A apart
Module area 3.106 m² 2.583 m² 0.523 m² apart
Module efficiency 21.57 % 21.29 % 0.28 pp more efficient
Open-circuit voltage 46.50 V 49.70 V 3.20 V apart
Current at max power 17.22 A 13.14 A 4.08 A apart
Cell count 132 144 12 cells apart
Voltage at max power 38.90 V 41.90 V 3.00 V apart
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2278x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x35 mm vs 2278x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.350 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
66.AAA.05-670
21,889 kWh
72.550.05
17,969 kWh
Lifetime gap
3,920 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 66.AAA.05-670 72.550.05
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 670 W 550 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.8% of rated power 635 W 521 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.5% of rated power 600 W 492 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.2% of rated power 564 W 463 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 66.AAA.05-670 72.550.05 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 670 Wp 550 Wp +120 W for 66.AAA.05-670
Module efficiency 21.57 % 21.29 % +0.28 pp for 66.AAA.05-670
Power density 215.7 Wp/m² 212.9 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 46.50 V 49.70 V 3.20 V apart
Voltage at max power 38.90 V 41.90 V 3.00 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.11 A 13.82 A 4.29 A apart
Current at max power 17.22 A 13.14 A 4.08 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.350 %/°C -0.350 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2278x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x35 mm vs 2278x1134x30 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 2.583 m² 0.523 m² apart
Weight 39.5 kg 32.5 kg -7.0 kg for 72.550.05
Weight per kWp 59.0 kg/kWp 59.1 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.50 %/yr 0.50 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology PERC PERC Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 144 12 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#7,798 vs #8,776
66.AAA.05-670 leads by 978 places
Power density
#7,708 vs #8,563
66.AAA.05-670 leads by 855 places
Heat behaviour
#10,489 vs #10,489
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#12,051 vs #12,099
66.AAA.05-670 leads by 48 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,542 vs #7,059
66.AAA.05-670 leads by 4,517 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-670 vs Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-680
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-670 vs Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-670 vs Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-675
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-670 vs Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-665
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-670 vs Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-660
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-670 vs Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-655
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-670 or Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.550.05?
According to our database: Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-670 has higher module efficiency (21.57% vs 21.29%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-670 and Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.550.05?
Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-670 has a module efficiency of 21.57%, while Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.550.05 is 21.29%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-670 use vs Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.550.05?
Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-670 uses PERC cells; Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.550.05 uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-670 and Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.550.05?
Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-670 has a 30 years power warranty; Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.550.05 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-670 and Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.550.05 bifacial panels?
Both Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.66.AAA.05-670 and Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.550.05 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.