Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-580 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05
VS
The verdict
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 1.21 pp more efficient. 9 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 10 differencesHow alike are they
9
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
10 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-580
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05
Difference
Module efficiency
22.45 %
23.66 %
1.21 pp more efficient
Rated power
580 Wp
735 Wp
155 W more power
Power density
224.5 Wp/m²
236.6 Wp/m²
12.1 Wp/m² higher
Weight
31.6 kg
39.5 kg
7.9 kg lighter
Temperature coefficient
-0.280 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
0.020 %/°C better in heat
Short-circuit current
14.20 A
17.82 A
3.62 A apart
Module area
2.583 m²
3.106 m²
0.523 m² apart
Current at max power
13.56 A
17.04 A
3.48 A apart
Cell count
72
132
60 cells apart
Dimensions
2278x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x35 mm
2278x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-580
19,460 kWh
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05
24,737 kWh
Lifetime gap
5,277 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-580
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
580 W
735 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.8% of rated power
556 W
706 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.6% of rated power
531 W
678 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.4% of rated power
507 W
649 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-580
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
580 Wp
735 Wp
+155 W for SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05
Module efficiency
22.45 %
23.66 %
+1.21 pp for SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05
Power density
224.5 Wp/m²
236.6 Wp/m²
+12.1 Wp/m² for SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05
Open-circuit voltage
50.90 V
51.60 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
42.80 V
43.20 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
14.20 A
17.82 A
3.62 A apart
Current at max power
13.56 A
17.04 A
3.48 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.280 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
+0.020 %/°C for SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05
Mechanical
Dimensions
2278x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x35 mm
2278x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
Module area
2.583 m²
3.106 m²
0.523 m² apart
Weight
31.6 kg
39.5 kg
-7.9 kg for HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-580
Weight per kWp
54.5 kg/kWp
53.7 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.38 %/yr
Effectively the same
Technology
Cell technology
HJT
HJT
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
72
132
60 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#4,620
vs
#602
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 leads by 4,018 places
Power density
#4,547
vs
#582
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 leads by 3,965 places
Heat behaviour
#1,309
vs
#511
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 leads by 798 places
Weight
#8,829
vs
#7,773
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 leads by 1,056 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#4,547
vs
#246
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 leads by 4,301 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-580 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-605
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-580 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-600
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-580 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-595
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-580 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-590
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-580 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-585
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05
The same specification on paper
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-580 or Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05?
According to our database: Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 has higher module efficiency (23.66% vs 22.45%); Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.280%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-580 and Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-580 has a module efficiency of 22.45%, while Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 is 23.66%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-580 use vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-580 uses HJT cells; Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-580 and Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-580 has a 30 years power warranty; Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-580 and Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 bifacial panels?
Both Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-580 and Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

