Skip to main content
580 vs 600 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-580 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-600

Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-580
Vikram Solar
HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-580
580 Wp 22.45 % HJT Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-600
Vikram Solar
HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-600
600 Wp 23.23 % HJT Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

600 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.78 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter 580 600 Difference
Module efficiency 22.45 % 23.23 % 0.78 pp more efficient
Power density 224.5 Wp/m² 232.3 Wp/m² 7.7 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 580 Wp 600 Wp 20 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
580
19,460 kWh
600
20,131 kWh
Lifetime gap
671 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 580 600
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 580 W 600 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.8% of rated power 556 W 575 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.6% of rated power 531 W 550 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.4% of rated power 507 W 524 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 580 600 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 580 Wp 600 Wp +20 W for 600
Module efficiency 22.45 % 23.23 % +0.78 pp for 600
Power density 224.5 Wp/m² 232.3 Wp/m² +7.7 Wp/m² for 600
Open-circuit voltage 50.90 V 51.70 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 42.80 V 43.60 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.20 A 14.44 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.56 A 13.77 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.280 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2278x1134x30 mm 2278x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 2.583 m² 2.583 m² Same
Weight 31.6 kg 31.6 kg Same
Weight per kWp 54.5 kg/kWp 52.7 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology HJT HJT Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 72 72 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#4,620 vs #1,252
600 leads by 3,368 places
Power density
#4,547 vs #1,252
600 leads by 3,295 places
Heat behaviour
#1,309 vs #1,309
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#8,829 vs #6,293
600 leads by 2,536 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#4,547 vs #2,930
600 leads by 1,617 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-580 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-605
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-580 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-595
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-580 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-590
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-580 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-585
One difference: module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-580 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-580 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-580 or Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-600?
According to our database: Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-600 has higher module efficiency (23.23% vs 22.45%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-580 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-600?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-580 has a module efficiency of 22.45%, while Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-600 is 23.23%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-580 use vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-600?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-580 uses HJT cells; Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-600 uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-580 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-600?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-580 has a 30 years power warranty; Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-600 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-580 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-600 bifacial panels?
Both Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-580 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-600 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.