Ulica Solar UL-665M-132DG vs Ulica Solar TSM156-9-620BNDG
VS
The verdict
TSM156-9-620BNDG leads on the differences that matter
The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.050 %/°C better in heat. 5 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 14 differencesHow alike are they
5
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
14 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
UL-665M-132DG
TSM156-9-620BNDG
Difference
Temperature coefficient
-0.340 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
0.050 %/°C better in heat
Module efficiency
21.41 %
22.20 %
0.79 pp more efficient
Rated power
665 Wp
620 Wp
45 W more power
Product warranty
12 yrs
5 yrs
7 yrs longer
Weight
37.3 kg
33.5 kg
3.8 kg lighter
Power density
214.1 Wp/m²
221.8 Wp/m²
7.7 Wp/m² higher
Open-circuit voltage
45.80 V
55.82 V
10.02 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.53 A
14.16 A
4.37 A apart
Module area
3.106 m²
2.795 m²
0.311 m² apart
Voltage at max power
38.30 V
46.67 V
8.37 V apart
Current at max power
17.36 A
13.30 A
4.06 A apart
Cell count
132
156
24 cells apart
Weight per kWp
56.1 kg/kWp
54.0 kg/kWp
2.1 kg/kWp lighter
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2465x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x35 mm vs 2465x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
UL-665M-132DG
22,312 kWh
TSM156-9-620BNDG
20,802 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,510 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
UL-665M-132DG
TSM156-9-620BNDG
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
665 W
620 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.9% of rated power
631 W
593 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.8% of rated power
597 W
566 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.7% of rated power
563 W
539 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
UL-665M-132DG
TSM156-9-620BNDG
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
665 Wp
620 Wp
+45 W for UL-665M-132DG
Module efficiency
21.41 %
22.20 %
+0.79 pp for TSM156-9-620BNDG
Power density
214.1 Wp/m²
221.8 Wp/m²
+7.7 Wp/m² for TSM156-9-620BNDG
Open-circuit voltage
45.80 V
55.82 V
10.02 V apart
Voltage at max power
38.30 V
46.67 V
8.37 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.53 A
14.16 A
4.37 A apart
Current at max power
17.36 A
13.30 A
4.06 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.340 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
+0.050 %/°C for TSM156-9-620BNDG
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2465x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x35 mm vs 2465x1134x30 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
2.795 m²
0.311 m² apart
Weight
37.3 kg
33.5 kg
-3.8 kg for TSM156-9-620BNDG
Weight per kWp
56.1 kg/kWp
54.0 kg/kWp
-2.1 kg/kWp for TSM156-9-620BNDG
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
5 yrs
+7 yrs for UL-665M-132DG
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
156
24 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#8,280
vs
#5,817
TSM156-9-620BNDG leads by 2,463 places
Power density
#8,250
vs
#5,869
TSM156-9-620BNDG leads by 2,381 places
Heat behaviour
#8,778
vs
#2,165
TSM156-9-620BNDG leads by 6,613 places
Weight
#10,380
vs
#8,248
TSM156-9-620BNDG leads by 2,132 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,787
vs
#4,849
UL-665M-132DG leads by 2,062 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Ulica Solar
Ulica Solar UL-665M-132DG vs Ulica Solar UL-670M-132DG
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Ulica Solar
Ulica Solar UL-665M-132DG vs Ulica Solar UL-660M-132DG
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Ulica Solar
Ulica Solar UL-665M-132DG vs Ulica Solar UL-655M-132DG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Ulica Solar
Ulica Solar TSM156-9-620BNDG vs Ulica Solar TSM156-9-645BNDG
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Ulica Solar
Ulica Solar TSM156-9-620BNDG vs Ulica Solar TSM156-9-640BNDG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Ulica Solar
Ulica Solar TSM156-9-620BNDG vs Ulica Solar TSM156-9-635BNDG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Ulica Solar UL-665M-132DG or Ulica Solar TSM156-9-620BNDG?
According to our database: Ulica Solar TSM156-9-620BNDG has higher module efficiency (22.20% vs 21.41%); Ulica Solar TSM156-9-620BNDG tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.290%/°C vs -0.340%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Ulica Solar UL-665M-132DG and Ulica Solar TSM156-9-620BNDG?
Ulica Solar UL-665M-132DG has a module efficiency of 21.41%, while Ulica Solar TSM156-9-620BNDG is 22.20%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Ulica Solar UL-665M-132DG use vs Ulica Solar TSM156-9-620BNDG?
Ulica Solar UL-665M-132DG uses TOPCon cells; Ulica Solar TSM156-9-620BNDG uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Ulica Solar UL-665M-132DG and Ulica Solar TSM156-9-620BNDG?
Ulica Solar UL-665M-132DG has a 30 years power warranty; Ulica Solar TSM156-9-620BNDG has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Ulica Solar UL-665M-132DG and Ulica Solar TSM156-9-620BNDG bifacial panels?
Both Ulica Solar UL-665M-132DG and Ulica Solar TSM156-9-620BNDG are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 8 Ulica Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.