Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750 vs Trina Solar TSM-DE19R-585
VS
The verdict
NEG21C.20Q-750 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 2.40 pp more efficient. 2 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 17 differencesHow alike are they
2
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
17 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
NEG21C.20Q-750
DE19R-585
Difference
Module efficiency
24.10 %
21.70 %
2.40 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.340 %/°C
0.080 %/°C better in heat
Rated power
750 Wp
585 Wp
165 W more power
Power density
241.4 Wp/m²
216.6 Wp/m²
24.9 Wp/m² higher
Performance warranty
30 yrs
25 yrs
5 yrs longer
Annual degradation
0.35 %/yr
0.55 %/yr
0.20 %/yr slower
Weight
38.3 kg
28.1 kg
10.2 kg lighter
Short-circuit current
18.77 A
15.99 A
2.78 A apart
Module area
3.106 m²
2.701 m²
0.405 m² apart
Open-circuit voltage
50.50 V
46.60 V
3.90 V apart
Cell technology
TOPCon
PERC
TOPCon vs PERC
Weight per kWp
51.1 kg/kWp
48.0 kg/kWp
3.0 kg/kWp lighter
Current at max power
17.66 A
14.90 A
2.76 A apart
Cell count
264
132
132 cells apart
Voltage at max power
42.50 V
39.30 V
3.20 V apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
2382x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
NEG21C.20Q-750
25,360 kWh
DE19R-585
18,959 kWh
Lifetime gap
6,401 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
NEG21C.20Q-750
DE19R-585
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
750 W
585 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.9% of rated power
721 W
555 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.8% of rated power
692 W
525 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.7% of rated power
662 W
495 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
NEG21C.20Q-750
DE19R-585
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
750 Wp
585 Wp
+165 W for NEG21C.20Q-750
Module efficiency
24.10 %
21.70 %
+2.40 pp for NEG21C.20Q-750
Power density
241.4 Wp/m²
216.6 Wp/m²
+24.9 Wp/m² for NEG21C.20Q-750
Open-circuit voltage
50.50 V
46.60 V
3.90 V apart
Voltage at max power
42.50 V
39.30 V
3.20 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.77 A
15.99 A
2.78 A apart
Current at max power
17.66 A
14.90 A
2.76 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.340 %/°C
+0.080 %/°C for NEG21C.20Q-750
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
2382x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
2.701 m²
0.405 m² apart
Weight
38.3 kg
28.1 kg
-10.2 kg for DE19R-585
Weight per kWp
51.1 kg/kWp
48.0 kg/kWp
-3.0 kg/kWp for DE19R-585
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
25 yrs
+5 yrs for NEG21C.20Q-750
Annual degradation
0.35 %/yr
0.55 %/yr
-0.20 %/yr for NEG21C.20Q-750
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
PERC
TOPCon vs PERC
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
264
132
132 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#241
vs
#7,485
NEG21C.20Q-750 leads by 7,244 places
Power density
#241
vs
#7,645
NEG21C.20Q-750 leads by 7,404 places
Heat behaviour
#515
vs
#8,846
NEG21C.20Q-750 leads by 8,331 places
Weight
#4,425
vs
#2,027
DE19R-585 leads by 2,398 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#9,912
NEG21C.20Q-750 leads by 9,891 places
Overall
#123
vs
#6,183
NEG21C.20Q-750 leads by 6,060 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.20Q
8 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750 or Trina Solar TSM-DE19R-585?
According to our database: Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750 has higher module efficiency (24.10% vs 21.70%); Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.340%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750 and Trina Solar TSM-DE19R-585?
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750 has a module efficiency of 24.10%, while Trina Solar TSM-DE19R-585 is 21.70%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750 use vs Trina Solar TSM-DE19R-585?
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750 uses TOPCon cells; Trina Solar TSM-DE19R-585 uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750 and Trina Solar TSM-DE19R-585?
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750 has a 30 years power warranty; Trina Solar TSM-DE19R-585 has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750 and Trina Solar TSM-DE19R-585 bifacial panels?
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Trina Solar TSM-DE19R-585 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 190 Trina Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

