Skip to main content
645 vs 620 14 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Trina Solar TSM-NE19R-645 vs Trina Solar TSM-NE19R-620

Trina Solar TSM-NE19R-645
TSM-NE19R-645
645 Wp 23.80 % TOPCon
VS
Trina Solar TSM-NE19R-620
TSM-NE19R-620
620 Wp 23.00 % TOPCon
The verdict

645 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.80 pp more efficient. 14 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 5 differences
How alike are they
14 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

5 of 19 parameters
Parameter 645 620 Difference
Module efficiency 23.80 % 23.00 % 0.80 pp more efficient
Power density 238.8 Wp/m² 229.5 Wp/m² 9.3 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 645 Wp 620 Wp 25 W more power
Open-circuit voltage 51.20 V 49.60 V 1.60 V apart
Voltage at max power 42.90 V 41.40 V 1.50 V apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
645
21,641 kWh
620
20,802 kWh
Lifetime gap
839 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 645 620
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 645 W 620 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 617 W 593 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 589 W 566 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 561 W 539 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 645 620 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 645 Wp 620 Wp +25 W for 645
Module efficiency 23.80 % 23.00 % +0.80 pp for 645
Power density 238.8 Wp/m² 229.5 Wp/m² +9.3 Wp/m² for 645
Open-circuit voltage 51.20 V 49.60 V 1.60 V apart
Voltage at max power 42.90 V 41.40 V 1.50 V apart
Short-circuit current 15.99 A 15.91 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 15.04 A 14.99 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 2382x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 2.701 m² 2.701 m² Same
Weight 27.9 kg 27.9 kg Same
Weight per kWp 43.3 kg/kWp 45.0 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#462 vs #1,970
645 leads by 1,508 places
Power density
#383 vs #2,243
645 leads by 1,860 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220 vs #2,220
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#285 vs #574
645 leads by 289 places
Warranty
#9,912 vs #9,912
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,914 vs #3,451
645 leads by 1,537 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NE19R-645 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.20Q
12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NE19R-645 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.20-650
9 differences, the largest is performance warranty
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NE19R-645 vs Trina Solar TSM-NE19R-650
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NE19R-645 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.20-645
8 differences, the largest is performance warranty
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NE19R-645 vs Trina Solar TSM-NED19RC.20
8 differences, the largest is performance warranty
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NE19R-645 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.20-640
8 differences, the largest is performance warranty
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Trina Solar TSM-NE19R-645 or Trina Solar TSM-NE19R-620?
According to our database: Trina Solar TSM-NE19R-645 has higher module efficiency (23.80% vs 23.00%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Trina Solar TSM-NE19R-645 and Trina Solar TSM-NE19R-620?
Trina Solar TSM-NE19R-645 has a module efficiency of 23.80%, while Trina Solar TSM-NE19R-620 is 23.00%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Trina Solar TSM-NE19R-645 use vs Trina Solar TSM-NE19R-620?
Trina Solar TSM-NE19R-645 uses TOPCon cells; Trina Solar TSM-NE19R-620 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Trina Solar TSM-NE19R-645 and Trina Solar TSM-NE19R-620?
Trina Solar TSM-NE19R-645 has a 25 years power warranty; Trina Solar TSM-NE19R-620 has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Shop prices: See 184 Trina Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.