Trina Solar TSM-610NEG19RC.20 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740
VS
The verdict
NEG21C.20 740 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 1.20 pp more efficient. 8 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 11 differencesHow alike are they
8
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
11 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
610NEG19RC.20
NEG21C.20 740
Difference
Module efficiency
22.60 %
23.80 %
1.20 pp more efficient
Rated power
610 Wp
740 Wp
130 W more power
Power density
225.8 Wp/m²
238.2 Wp/m²
12.4 Wp/m² higher
Weight
33.0 kg
38.3 kg
5.3 kg lighter
Short-circuit current
16.14 A
18.66 A
2.52 A apart
Module area
2.701 m²
3.106 m²
0.405 m² apart
Open-circuit voltage
48.09 V
50.30 V
2.21 V apart
Current at max power
15.33 A
17.58 A
2.25 A apart
Weight per kWp
54.1 kg/kWp
51.8 kg/kWp
2.3 kg/kWp lighter
Voltage at max power
39.79 V
42.10 V
2.31 V apart
Dimensions
2382x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2382x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
610NEG19RC.20
20,467 kWh
NEG21C.20 740
24,828 kWh
Lifetime gap
4,361 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
610NEG19RC.20
NEG21C.20 740
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
610 W
740 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
583 W
708 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
557 W
676 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
530 W
643 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
610NEG19RC.20
NEG21C.20 740
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
610 Wp
740 Wp
+130 W for NEG21C.20 740
Module efficiency
22.60 %
23.80 %
+1.20 pp for NEG21C.20 740
Power density
225.8 Wp/m²
238.2 Wp/m²
+12.4 Wp/m² for NEG21C.20 740
Open-circuit voltage
48.09 V
50.30 V
2.21 V apart
Voltage at max power
39.79 V
42.10 V
2.31 V apart
Short-circuit current
16.14 A
18.66 A
2.52 A apart
Current at max power
15.33 A
17.58 A
2.25 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2382x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2382x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area
2.701 m²
3.106 m²
0.405 m² apart
Weight
33.0 kg
38.3 kg
-5.3 kg for 610NEG19RC.20
Weight per kWp
54.1 kg/kWp
51.8 kg/kWp
-2.3 kg/kWp for NEG21C.20 740
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#3,716
vs
#462
NEG21C.20 740 leads by 3,254 places
Power density
#3,788
vs
#460
NEG21C.20 740 leads by 3,328 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220
vs
#2,220
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#8,404
vs
#5,156
NEG21C.20 740 leads by 3,248 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,331
vs
#185
NEG21C.20 740 leads by 3,146 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-610NEG19RC.20 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-610NEG19RC.20 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-610NEG19RC.20 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-610NEG19RC.20 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-610NEG19RC.20 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-610NEG19RC.20 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Trina Solar TSM-610NEG19RC.20 or Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740?
According to our database: Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740 has higher module efficiency (23.80% vs 22.60%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Trina Solar TSM-610NEG19RC.20 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740?
Trina Solar TSM-610NEG19RC.20 has a module efficiency of 22.60%, while Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740 is 23.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Trina Solar TSM-610NEG19RC.20 use vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740?
Trina Solar TSM-610NEG19RC.20 uses TOPCon cells; Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Trina Solar TSM-610NEG19RC.20 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740?
Trina Solar TSM-610NEG19RC.20 has a 30 years power warranty; Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Trina Solar TSM-610NEG19RC.20 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740 bifacial panels?
Both Trina Solar TSM-610NEG19RC.20 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 189 Trina Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.