Skip to main content
TSM-NEG9RC.27-450 vs JAM54D41-455/LB 12 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-450 vs JA Solar JAM54D41-455/LB

Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-450
TSM-NEG9RC.27-450
450 Wp 22.50 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
JA Solar JAM54D41-455/LB
JAM54D41-455/LB
455 Wp 22.80 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

JAM54D41-455/LB leads on the differences that matter

The largest is open-circuit voltage: 13.40 V apart. 12 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 7 differences
How alike are they
12 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

7 of 19 parameters
Parameter TSM-NEG9RC.27-450 JAM54D41-455/LB Difference
Open-circuit voltage 52.90 V 39.50 V 13.40 V apart
Short-circuit current 10.74 A 14.95 A 4.21 A apart
Module efficiency 22.50 % 22.80 % 0.30 pp more efficient
Voltage at max power 44.60 V 32.83 V 11.77 V apart
Current at max power 10.09 A 13.99 A 3.90 A apart
Cell count 144 108 36 cells apart
Weight 21.0 kg 22.0 kg 1.0 kg lighter
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
TSM-NEG9RC.27-450
15,098 kWh
JAM54D41-455/LB
15,266 kWh
Lifetime gap
168 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario TSM-NEG9RC.27-450 JAM54D41-455/LB
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 450 W 455 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 430 W 435 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 411 W 415 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 391 W 396 W
03

Full specification

Parameter TSM-NEG9RC.27-450 JAM54D41-455/LB Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 450 Wp 455 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 22.50 % 22.80 % +0.30 pp for JAM54D41-455/LB
Power density 225.2 Wp/m² 227.7 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 52.90 V 39.50 V 13.40 V apart
Voltage at max power 44.60 V 32.83 V 11.77 V apart
Short-circuit current 10.74 A 14.95 A 4.21 A apart
Current at max power 10.09 A 13.99 A 3.90 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 1.998 m² 1.998 m² Same
Weight 21.0 kg 22.0 kg -1.0 kg for TSM-NEG9RC.27-450
Weight per kWp 46.7 kg/kWp 48.4 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 108 36 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#4,281 vs #2,769
JAM54D41-455/LB leads by 1,512 places
Power density
#4,284 vs #2,943
JAM54D41-455/LB leads by 1,341 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220 vs #2,220
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#1,258 vs #2,224
TSM-NEG9RC.27-450 leads by 966 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#8,400 vs #7,876
JAM54D41-455/LB leads by 524 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-450 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-445
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-450 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-440
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-450 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-435
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-450 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-430
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-450 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-425
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54D41-455/LB vs JA Solar JAM54D40-475/LB
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-450 or JA Solar JAM54D41-455/LB?
According to our database: JA Solar JAM54D41-455/LB has higher module efficiency (22.80% vs 22.50%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-450 and JA Solar JAM54D41-455/LB?
Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-450 has a module efficiency of 22.50%, while JA Solar JAM54D41-455/LB is 22.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-450 use vs JA Solar JAM54D41-455/LB?
Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-450 uses TOPCon cells; JA Solar JAM54D41-455/LB uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-450 and JA Solar JAM54D41-455/LB?
Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-450 has a 30 years power warranty; JA Solar JAM54D41-455/LB has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-450 and JA Solar JAM54D41-455/LB bifacial panels?
Both Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27-450 and JA Solar JAM54D41-455/LB are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Compare Trina Solar and JA Solar as manufacturers Portfolio, efficiency, cell technologies and warranty terms

Shop prices: See 194 Trina Solar offers · See 328 JA Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.