Skip to main content
NEG21C.20-740 vs 610NEG19RC.20 8 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740 vs Trina Solar TSM-610NEG19RC.20

Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740
TSM-NEG21C.20-740
740 Wp 23.80 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Trina Solar TSM-610NEG19RC.20
TSM-610NEG19RC.20
610 Wp 22.60 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

NEG21C.20-740 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.20 pp more efficient. 8 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 11 differences
How alike are they
8 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

11 of 19 parameters
Parameter NEG21C.20-740 610NEG19RC.20 Difference
Module efficiency 23.80 % 22.60 % 1.20 pp more efficient
Rated power 740 Wp 610 Wp 130 W more power
Power density 238.2 Wp/m² 225.8 Wp/m² 12.4 Wp/m² higher
Weight 38.3 kg 33.0 kg 5.3 kg lighter
Short-circuit current 18.66 A 16.14 A 2.52 A apart
Module area 3.106 m² 2.701 m² 0.405 m² apart
Open-circuit voltage 50.30 V 48.09 V 2.21 V apart
Current at max power 17.58 A 15.33 A 2.25 A apart
Weight per kWp 51.8 kg/kWp 54.1 kg/kWp 2.3 kg/kWp lighter
Voltage at max power 42.10 V 39.79 V 2.31 V apart
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
NEG21C.20-740
24,828 kWh
610NEG19RC.20
20,467 kWh
Lifetime gap
4,361 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario NEG21C.20-740 610NEG19RC.20
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 740 W 610 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 708 W 583 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 676 W 557 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 643 W 530 W
03

Full specification

Parameter NEG21C.20-740 610NEG19RC.20 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 740 Wp 610 Wp +130 W for NEG21C.20-740
Module efficiency 23.80 % 22.60 % +1.20 pp for NEG21C.20-740
Power density 238.2 Wp/m² 225.8 Wp/m² +12.4 Wp/m² for NEG21C.20-740
Open-circuit voltage 50.30 V 48.09 V 2.21 V apart
Voltage at max power 42.10 V 39.79 V 2.31 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.66 A 16.14 A 2.52 A apart
Current at max power 17.58 A 15.33 A 2.25 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 2.701 m² 0.405 m² apart
Weight 38.3 kg 33.0 kg -5.3 kg for 610NEG19RC.20
Weight per kWp 51.8 kg/kWp 54.1 kg/kWp -2.3 kg/kWp for NEG21C.20-740
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#462 vs #3,716
NEG21C.20-740 leads by 3,254 places
Power density
#460 vs #3,788
NEG21C.20-740 leads by 3,328 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220 vs #2,220
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#5,156 vs #8,404
NEG21C.20-740 leads by 3,248 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#185 vs #3,331
NEG21C.20-740 leads by 3,146 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-735
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-730
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-725
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-720
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-715
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-610NEG19RC.20 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740 or Trina Solar TSM-610NEG19RC.20?
According to our database: Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740 has higher module efficiency (23.80% vs 22.60%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740 and Trina Solar TSM-610NEG19RC.20?
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740 has a module efficiency of 23.80%, while Trina Solar TSM-610NEG19RC.20 is 22.60%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740 use vs Trina Solar TSM-610NEG19RC.20?
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740 uses TOPCon cells; Trina Solar TSM-610NEG19RC.20 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740 and Trina Solar TSM-610NEG19RC.20?
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740 has a 30 years power warranty; Trina Solar TSM-610NEG19RC.20 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740 and Trina Solar TSM-610NEG19RC.20 bifacial panels?
Both Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740 and Trina Solar TSM-610NEG19RC.20 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 190 Trina Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.