Skip to main content
DE19R-565 vs NEG21C.20-740 3 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Trina Solar TSM-DE19R-565 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740

Trina Solar TSM-DE19R-565
TSM-DE19R-565
565 Wp 20.90 % PERC
VS
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740
TSM-NEG21C.20-740
740 Wp 23.80 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

NEG21C.20-740 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 2.90 pp more efficient. 3 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 16 differences
How alike are they
3 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

16 of 19 parameters
Parameter DE19R-565 NEG21C.20-740 Difference
Module efficiency 20.90 % 23.80 % 2.90 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient -0.340 %/°C -0.290 %/°C 0.050 %/°C better in heat
Rated power 565 Wp 740 Wp 175 W more power
Power density 209.2 Wp/m² 238.2 Wp/m² 29.1 Wp/m² higher
Performance warranty 25 yrs 30 yrs 5 yrs longer
Annual degradation 0.55 %/yr 0.40 %/yr 0.15 %/yr slower
Weight 28.1 kg 38.3 kg 10.2 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage 45.60 V 50.30 V 4.70 V apart
Short-circuit current 15.81 A 18.66 A 2.85 A apart
Module area 2.701 m² 3.106 m² 0.405 m² apart
Cell technology PERC TOPCon PERC vs TOPCon
Current at max power 14.76 A 17.58 A 2.82 A apart
Voltage at max power 38.30 V 42.10 V 3.80 V apart
Weight per kWp 49.7 kg/kWp 51.8 kg/kWp 2.0 kg/kWp lighter
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
DE19R-565
18,311 kWh
NEG21C.20-740
24,828 kWh
Lifetime gap
6,517 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario DE19R-565 NEG21C.20-740
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 565 W 740 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.9% of rated power 536 W 708 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.8% of rated power 507 W 676 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.7% of rated power 479 W 643 W
03

Full specification

Parameter DE19R-565 NEG21C.20-740 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 565 Wp 740 Wp +175 W for NEG21C.20-740
Module efficiency 20.90 % 23.80 % +2.90 pp for NEG21C.20-740
Power density 209.2 Wp/m² 238.2 Wp/m² +29.1 Wp/m² for NEG21C.20-740
Open-circuit voltage 45.60 V 50.30 V 4.70 V apart
Voltage at max power 38.30 V 42.10 V 3.80 V apart
Short-circuit current 15.81 A 18.66 A 2.85 A apart
Current at max power 14.76 A 17.58 A 2.82 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.340 %/°C -0.290 %/°C +0.050 %/°C for NEG21C.20-740
Mechanical
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area 2.701 m² 3.106 m² 0.405 m² apart
Weight 28.1 kg 38.3 kg -10.2 kg for DE19R-565
Weight per kWp 49.7 kg/kWp 51.8 kg/kWp -2.0 kg/kWp for DE19R-565
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 25 yrs 30 yrs +5 yrs for NEG21C.20-740
Annual degradation 0.55 %/yr 0.40 %/yr -0.15 %/yr for NEG21C.20-740
Technology
Cell technology PERC TOPCon PERC vs TOPCon
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#10,148 vs #462
NEG21C.20-740 leads by 9,686 places
Power density
#10,162 vs #460
NEG21C.20-740 leads by 9,702 places
Heat behaviour
#8,846 vs #2,220
NEG21C.20-740 leads by 6,626 places
Weight
#3,222 vs #5,156
DE19R-565 leads by 1,934 places
Warranty
#9,912 vs #21
NEG21C.20-740 leads by 9,891 places
Overall
#8,011 vs #185
NEG21C.20-740 leads by 7,826 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-DE19R-565 vs Trina Solar TSM-DE19R-585
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-DE19R-565 vs Trina Solar TSM-DE19R-580
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-DE19R-565 vs Trina Solar TSM-DE19R-575
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-DE19R-565 vs Trina Solar TSM-DE19R-570
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-735
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-730
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Trina Solar TSM-DE19R-565 or Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740?
According to our database: Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740 has higher module efficiency (23.80% vs 20.90%); Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.290%/°C vs -0.340%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Trina Solar TSM-DE19R-565 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740?
Trina Solar TSM-DE19R-565 has a module efficiency of 20.90%, while Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740 is 23.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Trina Solar TSM-DE19R-565 use vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740?
Trina Solar TSM-DE19R-565 uses PERC cells; Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Trina Solar TSM-DE19R-565 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740?
Trina Solar TSM-DE19R-565 has a 25 years power warranty; Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Trina Solar TSM-DE19R-565 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740 bifacial panels?
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Trina Solar TSM-DE19R-565 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 184 Trina Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.