Skip to main content
TWMND-72 HD575 vs JW-HD108N-415 7 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Tongwei TWMND-72 HD575 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-415

Tongwei TWMND-72 HD575
TWMND-72 HD575
575 Wp 22.30 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Jolywood JW-HD108N-415
Jolywood
JW-HD108N-415
415 Wp 21.25 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

TWMND-72 HD575 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.05 pp more efficient. 7 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 12 differences
How alike are they
7 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

12 of 19 parameters
Parameter TWMND-72 HD575 JW-HD108N-415 Difference
Module efficiency 22.30 % 21.25 % 1.05 pp more efficient
Rated power 575 Wp 415 Wp 160 W more power
Power density 222.6 Wp/m² 212.5 Wp/m² 10.1 Wp/m² higher
Weight 31.5 kg 24.5 kg 7.0 kg lighter
Product warranty 12 yrs 25 yrs 13 yrs longer
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.300 %/°C 0.020 %/°C better in heat
Open-circuit voltage 52.10 V 37.70 V 14.40 V apart
Module area 2.583 m² 1.953 m² 0.631 m² apart
Weight per kWp 54.8 kg/kWp 59.0 kg/kWp 4.3 kg/kWp lighter
Voltage at max power 43.76 V 31.70 V 12.06 V apart
Cell count 144 108 36 cells apart
Dimensions 2278x1134x30 mm 1722x1134x30 mm 2278x1134x30 mm vs 1722x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
TWMND-72 HD575
19,292 kWh
JW-HD108N-415
13,924 kWh
Lifetime gap
5,368 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario TWMND-72 HD575 JW-HD108N-415
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 575 W 415 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 551 W 396 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 527 W 378 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 503 W 359 W
03

Full specification

Parameter TWMND-72 HD575 JW-HD108N-415 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 575 Wp 415 Wp +160 W for TWMND-72 HD575
Module efficiency 22.30 % 21.25 % +1.05 pp for TWMND-72 HD575
Power density 222.6 Wp/m² 212.5 Wp/m² +10.1 Wp/m² for TWMND-72 HD575
Open-circuit voltage 52.10 V 37.70 V 14.40 V apart
Voltage at max power 43.76 V 31.70 V 12.06 V apart
Short-circuit current 13.80 A 13.91 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.14 A 13.10 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.300 %/°C +0.020 %/°C for TWMND-72 HD575
Mechanical
Dimensions 2278x1134x30 mm 1722x1134x30 mm 2278x1134x30 mm vs 1722x1134x30 mm
Module area 2.583 m² 1.953 m² 0.631 m² apart
Weight 31.5 kg 24.5 kg -7.0 kg for JW-HD108N-415
Weight per kWp 54.8 kg/kWp 59.0 kg/kWp -4.3 kg/kWp for TWMND-72 HD575
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 25 yrs +13 yrs for JW-HD108N-415
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 108 36 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#5,161 vs #8,973
TWMND-72 HD575 leads by 3,812 places
Power density
#5,612 vs #8,858
TWMND-72 HD575 leads by 3,246 places
Heat behaviour
#1,347 vs #6,152
TWMND-72 HD575 leads by 4,805 places
Weight
#9,257 vs #12,081
TWMND-72 HD575 leads by 2,824 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#4,927 vs #9,171
TWMND-72 HD575 leads by 4,244 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TWMND-72 HD575 vs Tongwei TWMNF-66HD750
12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TWMND-72 HD575 vs Tongwei TWMNF-66HD745
12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TWMND-72 HD575 vs Tongwei TWMNF-66HD740
12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TWMND-72 HD575 vs Tongwei TWMNF-66HD735
12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TWMND-72 HD575 vs Tongwei TWMNF-66HD730
12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TWMND-72 HD575 vs Tongwei TWMNF-66HD725
12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Tongwei TWMND-72 HD575 or Jolywood JW-HD108N-415?
According to our database: Tongwei TWMND-72 HD575 has higher module efficiency (22.30% vs 21.25%); Tongwei TWMND-72 HD575 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.280%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Tongwei TWMND-72 HD575 and Jolywood JW-HD108N-415?
Tongwei TWMND-72 HD575 has a module efficiency of 22.30%, while Jolywood JW-HD108N-415 is 21.25%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Tongwei TWMND-72 HD575 use vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-415?
Tongwei TWMND-72 HD575 uses TOPCon cells; Jolywood JW-HD108N-415 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Tongwei TWMND-72 HD575 and Jolywood JW-HD108N-415?
Tongwei TWMND-72 HD575 has a 30 years power warranty; Jolywood JW-HD108N-415 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Tongwei TWMND-72 HD575 and Jolywood JW-HD108N-415 bifacial panels?
Both Tongwei TWMND-72 HD575 and Jolywood JW-HD108N-415 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Compare Tongwei and Jolywood as manufacturers Portfolio, efficiency, cell technologies and warranty terms

Shop prices: See 56 Tongwei offers · See 24 Jolywood offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.