Skip to main content
SPDG590-N144M10 vs SPDG440-N108M10 9 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Sunpro Power SPDG590-N144M10 vs Sunpro Power SPDG440-N108M10

Sunpro Power SPDG590-N144M10
Sunpro Power
SPDG590-N144M10
590 Wp 22.83 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Sunpro Power SPDG440-N108M10
Sunpro Power
SPDG440-N108M10
440 Wp 22.53 % TOPCon
The verdict

SPDG590-N144M10 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 150 W more power. 9 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 10 differences
How alike are they
9 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

10 of 19 parameters
Parameter SPDG590-N144M10 SPDG440-N108M10 Difference
Rated power 590 Wp 440 Wp 150 W more power
Weight 31.0 kg 23.3 kg 7.7 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage 51.70 V 38.53 V 13.17 V apart
Module area 2.583 m² 1.953 m² 0.631 m² apart
Module efficiency 22.83 % 22.53 % 0.30 pp more efficient
Power density 228.4 Wp/m² 225.3 Wp/m² 3.1 Wp/m² higher
Voltage at max power 42.87 V 32.09 V 10.78 V apart
Cell count 144 108 36 cells apart
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
Dimensions 2278x1134x30 mm 1722x1134x30 mm 2278x1134x30 mm vs 1722x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
SPDG590-N144M10
19,796 kWh
SPDG440-N108M10
14,763 kWh
Lifetime gap
5,033 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario SPDG590-N144M10 SPDG440-N108M10
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 590 W 440 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 563 W 420 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 537 W 400 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 510 W 381 W
03

Full specification

Parameter SPDG590-N144M10 SPDG440-N108M10 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 590 Wp 440 Wp +150 W for SPDG590-N144M10
Module efficiency 22.83 % 22.53 % +0.30 pp for SPDG590-N144M10
Power density 228.4 Wp/m² 225.3 Wp/m² +3.1 Wp/m² for SPDG590-N144M10
Open-circuit voltage 51.70 V 38.53 V 13.17 V apart
Voltage at max power 42.87 V 32.09 V 10.78 V apart
Short-circuit current 14.48 A 14.43 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.77 A 13.72 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.300 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2278x1134x30 mm 1722x1134x30 mm 2278x1134x30 mm vs 1722x1134x30 mm
Module area 2.583 m² 1.953 m² 0.631 m² apart
Weight 31.0 kg 23.3 kg -7.7 kg for SPDG440-N108M10
Weight per kWp 52.5 kg/kWp 53.0 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 108 36 cells apart
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#2,738 vs #4,041
SPDG590-N144M10 leads by 1,303 places
Power density
#2,653 vs #4,158
SPDG590-N144M10 leads by 1,505 places
Heat behaviour
#6,152 vs #6,152
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#6,201 vs #6,737
SPDG590-N144M10 leads by 536 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,588 vs #6,586
SPDG590-N144M10 leads by 4,998 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Sunpro Power
Sunpro Power SPDG590-N144M10 vs Sunpro Power SPDG600-N144M10
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sunpro Power
Sunpro Power SPDG590-N144M10 vs Sunpro Power SPDG595-N144M10
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Sunpro Power
Sunpro Power SPDG590-N144M10 vs Sunpro Power SPDG585-N144M10
One difference: bifacial
Same series, other bin
Sunpro Power
Sunpro Power SPDG590-N144M10 vs Sunpro Power SPDG500-N120M10
8 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Sunpro Power
Sunpro Power SPDG590-N144M10 vs Sunpro Power SPDG495-N120M10
7 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Sunpro Power
Sunpro Power SPDG590-N144M10 vs Sunpro Power SPDG490-N120M10
9 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Sunpro Power SPDG590-N144M10 or Sunpro Power SPDG440-N108M10?
According to our database: Sunpro Power SPDG590-N144M10 has higher module efficiency (22.83% vs 22.53%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Sunpro Power SPDG590-N144M10 and Sunpro Power SPDG440-N108M10?
Sunpro Power SPDG590-N144M10 has a module efficiency of 22.83%, while Sunpro Power SPDG440-N108M10 is 22.53%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Sunpro Power SPDG590-N144M10 use vs Sunpro Power SPDG440-N108M10?
Sunpro Power SPDG590-N144M10 uses TOPCon cells; Sunpro Power SPDG440-N108M10 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Sunpro Power SPDG590-N144M10 and Sunpro Power SPDG440-N108M10?
Sunpro Power SPDG590-N144M10 has a 30 years power warranty; Sunpro Power SPDG440-N108M10 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Sunpro Power SPDG590-N144M10 and Sunpro Power SPDG440-N108M10 bifacial panels?
Sunpro Power SPDG590-N144M10 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Sunpro Power SPDG440-N108M10 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 12 Sunpro Power offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.