Skip to main content
72HBG 610W vs 54HBG-430 6 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610W vs Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-430

Sun Earth
DXM8-72HBG 610W
610 Wp 23.60 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page
VS
Sun Earth
DXM8-54HBG-430
430 Wp 22.00 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page
The verdict

13 differences, and they point both ways

The largest is module efficiency: 1.60 pp more efficient. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 13 differences
How alike are they
6 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

13 of 19 parameters
Parameter 72HBG 610W 54HBG-430 Difference
Module efficiency 23.60 % 22.00 % 1.60 pp more efficient
Rated power 610 Wp 430 Wp 180 W more power
Power density 236.1 Wp/m² 220.2 Wp/m² 15.9 Wp/m² higher
Performance warranty 30 yrs 40 yrs 10 yrs longer
Weight 32.0 kg 24.5 kg 7.5 kg lighter
Product warranty 12 yrs 40 yrs 28 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage 52.50 V 38.30 V 14.20 V apart
Module area 2.583 m² 1.953 m² 0.631 m² apart
Weight per kWp 52.5 kg/kWp 57.0 kg/kWp 4.5 kg/kWp lighter
Voltage at max power 43.10 V 31.80 V 11.30 V apart
Cell count 144 108 36 cells apart
Dimensions 2278x1134x30 mm 1722x1134x30 mm 2278x1134x30 mm vs 1722x1134x30 mm
Current at max power 14.15 A 13.52 A 0.63 A apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
72HBG 610W
20,467 kWh
54HBG-430
14,427 kWh
Lifetime gap
6,040 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 72HBG 610W 54HBG-430
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 610 W 430 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 583 W 411 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 557 W 393 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 530 W 374 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 72HBG 610W 54HBG-430 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 610 Wp 430 Wp +180 W for 72HBG 610W
Module efficiency 23.60 % 22.00 % +1.60 pp for 72HBG 610W
Power density 236.1 Wp/m² 220.2 Wp/m² +15.9 Wp/m² for 72HBG 610W
Open-circuit voltage 52.50 V 38.30 V 14.20 V apart
Voltage at max power 43.10 V 31.80 V 11.30 V apart
Short-circuit current 14.76 A 14.29 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 14.15 A 13.52 A 0.63 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2278x1134x30 mm 1722x1134x30 mm 2278x1134x30 mm vs 1722x1134x30 mm
Module area 2.583 m² 1.953 m² 0.631 m² apart
Weight 32.0 kg 24.5 kg -7.5 kg for 54HBG-430
Weight per kWp 52.5 kg/kWp 57.0 kg/kWp -4.5 kg/kWp for 72HBG 610W
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 40 yrs +28 yrs for 54HBG-430
Performance warranty 30 yrs 40 yrs +10 yrs for 54HBG-430
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 108 36 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

13,953 panels
Efficiency
#621 vs #6,452
72HBG 610W leads by 5,831 places
Power density
#617 vs #6,417
72HBG 610W leads by 5,800 places
Heat behaviour
#2,146 vs #2,146
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#5,953 vs #10,895
72HBG 610W leads by 4,942 places
Warranty
#21 vs #1
54HBG-430 leads by 20 places
Overall
#2,202 vs #2,420
72HBG 610W leads by 218 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Sun Earth
Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610W vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 600W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sun Earth
Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610W vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 590W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sun Earth
Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610W vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 580W
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sun Earth
Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610W vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 570W
7 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sun Earth
Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610W vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 560W
8 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sun Earth
Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-430 vs Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-455
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610W or Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-430?
According to our database: Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610 W has higher module efficiency (23.60% vs 22.00%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610W and Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-430?
Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610 W has a module efficiency of 23.60%, while Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-430 is 22.00%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610W use vs Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-430?
Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610 W uses TOPCon cells; Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-430 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610W and Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-430?
Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610 W has a 30 years power warranty; Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-430 has a 40 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610W and Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-430 bifacial panels?
Both Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610 W and Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-430 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 12 Sun Earth offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.