Skip to main content
54HBG-440 vs 72HBG 610W 7 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-440 vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610W

Sun Earth
DXM8-54HBG-440
440 Wp 22.50 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610W
Sun Earth
DXM8-72HBG 610W
610 Wp 23.60 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

12 differences, and they point both ways

The largest is module efficiency: 1.10 pp more efficient. 7 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 12 differences
How alike are they
7 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

12 of 19 parameters
Parameter 54HBG-440 72HBG 610W Difference
Module efficiency 22.50 % 23.60 % 1.10 pp more efficient
Rated power 440 Wp 610 Wp 170 W more power
Performance warranty 40 yrs 30 yrs 10 yrs longer
Power density 225.3 Wp/m² 236.1 Wp/m² 10.8 Wp/m² higher
Weight 24.5 kg 32.0 kg 7.5 kg lighter
Product warranty 40 yrs 12 yrs 28 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage 38.70 V 52.50 V 13.80 V apart
Module area 1.953 m² 2.583 m² 0.631 m² apart
Weight per kWp 55.7 kg/kWp 52.5 kg/kWp 3.2 kg/kWp lighter
Voltage at max power 32.00 V 43.10 V 11.10 V apart
Cell count 108 144 36 cells apart
Dimensions 1722x1134x30 mm 2278x1134x30 mm 1722x1134x30 mm vs 2278x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
54HBG-440
14,763 kWh
72HBG 610W
20,467 kWh
Lifetime gap
5,704 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 54HBG-440 72HBG 610W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 440 W 610 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 421 W 583 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 402 W 557 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 383 W 530 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 54HBG-440 72HBG 610W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 440 Wp 610 Wp +170 W for 72HBG 610W
Module efficiency 22.50 % 23.60 % +1.10 pp for 72HBG 610W
Power density 225.3 Wp/m² 236.1 Wp/m² +10.8 Wp/m² for 72HBG 610W
Open-circuit voltage 38.70 V 52.50 V 13.80 V apart
Voltage at max power 32.00 V 43.10 V 11.10 V apart
Short-circuit current 14.46 A 14.76 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.75 A 14.15 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1722x1134x30 mm 2278x1134x30 mm 1722x1134x30 mm vs 2278x1134x30 mm
Module area 1.953 m² 2.583 m² 0.631 m² apart
Weight 24.5 kg 32.0 kg -7.5 kg for 54HBG-440
Weight per kWp 55.7 kg/kWp 52.5 kg/kWp -3.2 kg/kWp for 72HBG 610W
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 40 yrs 12 yrs +28 yrs for 54HBG-440
Performance warranty 40 yrs 30 yrs +10 yrs for 54HBG-440
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 144 36 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#4,281 vs #659
72HBG 610W leads by 3,622 places
Power density
#4,158 vs #656
72HBG 610W leads by 3,502 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220 vs #2,220
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#10,132 vs #6,035
72HBG 610W leads by 4,097 places
Warranty
#1 vs #21
54HBG-440 leads by 20 places
Overall
#1,795 vs #2,252
54HBG-440 leads by 457 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Sun Earth
Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-440 vs Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-455
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sun Earth
Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-440 vs Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-450
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sun Earth
Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-440 vs Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-435
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sun Earth
Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-440 vs Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-430
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sun Earth
Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-440 vs Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-420
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sun Earth
Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610W vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 600W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-440 or Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610W?
According to our database: Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610 W has higher module efficiency (23.60% vs 22.50%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-440 and Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610W?
Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-440 has a module efficiency of 22.50%, while Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610 W is 23.60%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-440 use vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610W?
Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-440 uses TOPCon cells; Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-440 and Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610W?
Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-440 has a 40 years power warranty; Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-440 and Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610W bifacial panels?
Both Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-440 and Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610 W are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 17 Sun Earth offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.