Silfab SIL-630 XL vs Silfab SIL-430 BG+
VS
The verdict
630 XL leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 1.16 pp more efficient. 4 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 15 differencesHow alike are they
4
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
15 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
630 XL
430 BG+
Difference
Module efficiency
22.56 %
21.40 %
1.16 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.377 %/°C
0.087 %/°C better in heat
Rated power
630 Wp
430 Wp
200 W more power
Power density
225.6 Wp/m²
213.5 Wp/m²
12.0 Wp/m² higher
Weight
29.5 kg
21.8 kg
7.7 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage
57.49 V
47.96 V
9.53 V apart
Short-circuit current
13.66 A
11.33 A
2.33 A apart
Module area
2.793 m²
2.014 m²
0.779 m² apart
Weight per kWp
46.8 kg/kWp
50.7 kg/kWp
3.9 kg/kWp lighter
Cell technology
N-type
PERC
N-type vs PERC
Voltage at max power
48.47 V
39.83 V
8.64 V apart
Current at max power
13.00 A
10.80 A
2.20 A apart
Cell count
156
138
18 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
Dimensions
2465x1133x35 mm
1957x1029x35 mm
2465x1133x35 mm vs 1957x1029x35 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
630 XL
21,240 kWh
430 BG+
14,497 kWh
Lifetime gap
6,743 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
630 XL
430 BG+
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
630 W
430 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.3% of rated power
603 W
406 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
88.7% of rated power
575 W
381 W
Hot roof
70 °C
83.0% of rated power
548 W
357 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
630 XL
430 BG+
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
630 Wp
430 Wp
+200 W for 630 XL
Module efficiency
22.56 %
21.40 %
+1.16 pp for 630 XL
Power density
225.6 Wp/m²
213.5 Wp/m²
+12.0 Wp/m² for 630 XL
Open-circuit voltage
57.49 V
47.96 V
9.53 V apart
Voltage at max power
48.47 V
39.83 V
8.64 V apart
Short-circuit current
13.66 A
11.33 A
2.33 A apart
Current at max power
13.00 A
10.80 A
2.20 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.377 %/°C
+0.087 %/°C for 630 XL
Mechanical
Dimensions
2465x1133x35 mm
1957x1029x35 mm
2465x1133x35 mm vs 1957x1029x35 mm
Module area
2.793 m²
2.014 m²
0.779 m² apart
Weight
29.5 kg
21.8 kg
-7.7 kg for 430 BG+
Weight per kWp
46.8 kg/kWp
50.7 kg/kWp
-3.9 kg/kWp for 630 XL
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
25 yrs
25 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.30 %/yr
0.30 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
N-type
PERC
N-type vs PERC
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
156
138
18 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#3,959
vs
#8,388
630 XL leads by 4,429 places
Power density
#3,927
vs
#8,483
630 XL leads by 4,556 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220
vs
#13,470
630 XL leads by 11,250 places
Weight
#1,365
vs
#4,136
630 XL leads by 2,771 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,047
vs
#8,367
630 XL leads by 7,320 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-630 XL vs Silfab SIL-640 XL
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-630 XL vs Silfab SIL-620 XL
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-430 BG+ vs Silfab SIL-420-BG
9 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-430 BG+ vs Silfab SIL-410-BG
7 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-430 BG+ vs Silfab SIL-380 BK
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-430 BG+ vs Silfab SIL-370 BK
12 differences, the largest is rated power
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Silfab SIL-630 XL or Silfab SIL-430 BG+?
According to our database: Silfab SIL-630 XL has higher module efficiency (22.56% vs 21.40%); Silfab SIL-630 XL tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.290%/°C vs -0.377%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Silfab SIL-630 XL and Silfab SIL-430 BG+?
Silfab SIL-630 XL has a module efficiency of 22.56%, while Silfab SIL-430 BG+ is 21.40%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Silfab SIL-630 XL use vs Silfab SIL-430 BG+?
Silfab SIL-630 XL uses N-type cells; Silfab SIL-430 BG+ uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Silfab SIL-630 XL and Silfab SIL-430 BG+?
Silfab SIL-630 XL has a 30 years power warranty; Silfab SIL-430 BG+ has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Silfab SIL-630 XL and Silfab SIL-430 BG+ bifacial panels?
Silfab SIL-630 XL is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Silfab SIL-430 BG+ is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 2 Silfab offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.