Skip to main content
410-BG vs 620 XL 4 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Silfab SIL-410-BG vs Silfab SIL-620 XL

Silfab
SIL-410-BG
410 Wp 21.40 % PERC
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Silfab
SIL-620 XL
620 Wp 22.20 % N-type Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

620 XL leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.80 pp more efficient. 4 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 15 differences
How alike are they
4 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

15 of 19 parameters
Parameter 410-BG 620 XL Difference
Module efficiency 21.40 % 22.20 % 0.80 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient -0.377 %/°C -0.290 %/°C 0.087 %/°C better in heat
Rated power 410 Wp 620 Wp 210 W more power
Weight 20.8 kg 29.5 kg 8.7 kg lighter
Power density 213.8 Wp/m² 222.0 Wp/m² 8.2 Wp/m² higher
Open-circuit voltage 45.92 V 57.21 V 11.29 V apart
Short-circuit current 11.30 A 13.55 A 2.25 A apart
Module area 1.918 m² 2.793 m² 0.875 m² apart
Cell technology PERC N-type PERC vs N-type
Weight per kWp 50.7 kg/kWp 47.6 kg/kWp 3.2 kg/kWp lighter
Voltage at max power 38.08 V 48.16 V 10.08 V apart
Current at max power 10.77 A 12.87 A 2.10 A apart
Cell count 66 156 90 cells apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
Dimensions 1864x1029x35 mm 2465x1133x35 mm 1864x1029x35 mm vs 2465x1133x35 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
410-BG
13,801 kWh
620 XL
20,903 kWh
Lifetime gap
7,102 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 410-BG 620 XL
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 410 W 620 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.3% of rated power 387 W 593 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 88.7% of rated power 364 W 566 W
Hot roof 70 °C 83.0% of rated power 340 W 539 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 410-BG 620 XL Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 410 Wp 620 Wp +210 W for 620 XL
Module efficiency 21.40 % 22.20 % +0.80 pp for 620 XL
Power density 213.8 Wp/m² 222.0 Wp/m² +8.2 Wp/m² for 620 XL
Open-circuit voltage 45.92 V 57.21 V 11.29 V apart
Voltage at max power 38.08 V 48.16 V 10.08 V apart
Short-circuit current 11.30 A 13.55 A 2.25 A apart
Current at max power 10.77 A 12.87 A 2.10 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.377 %/°C -0.290 %/°C +0.087 %/°C for 620 XL
Mechanical
Dimensions 1864x1029x35 mm 2465x1133x35 mm 1864x1029x35 mm vs 2465x1133x35 mm
Module area 1.918 m² 2.793 m² 0.875 m² apart
Weight 20.8 kg 29.5 kg -8.7 kg for 410-BG
Weight per kWp 50.7 kg/kWp 47.6 kg/kWp -3.2 kg/kWp for 620 XL
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.31 %/yr 0.30 %/yr Effectively the same
Technology
Cell technology PERC N-type PERC vs N-type
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 66 156 90 cells apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#8,388 vs #5,881
620 XL leads by 2,507 places
Power density
#8,468 vs #5,913
620 XL leads by 2,555 places
Heat behaviour
#13,470 vs #2,220
620 XL leads by 11,250 places
Weight
#4,154 vs #1,762
620 XL leads by 2,392 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#9,073 vs #1,420
620 XL leads by 7,653 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-410-BG vs Silfab SIL-430 BG+
7 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-410-BG vs Silfab SIL-420-BG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-410-BG vs Silfab SIL-380 BK
7 differences, the largest is annual degradation
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-410-BG vs Silfab SIL-370 BK
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-620 XL vs Silfab SIL-640 XL
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-620 XL vs Silfab SIL-630 XL
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Silfab SIL-410-BG or Silfab SIL-620 XL?
According to our database: Silfab SIL-620 XL has higher module efficiency (22.20% vs 21.40%); Silfab SIL-620 XL tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.290%/°C vs -0.377%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Silfab SIL-410-BG and Silfab SIL-620 XL?
Silfab SIL-410-BG has a module efficiency of 21.40%, while Silfab SIL-620 XL is 22.20%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Silfab SIL-410-BG use vs Silfab SIL-620 XL?
Silfab SIL-410-BG uses PERC cells; Silfab SIL-620 XL uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Silfab SIL-410-BG and Silfab SIL-620 XL?
Silfab SIL-410-BG has a 30 years power warranty; Silfab SIL-620 XL has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Silfab SIL-410-BG and Silfab SIL-620 XL bifacial panels?
Silfab SIL-620 XL is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Silfab SIL-410-BG is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 2 Silfab offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.