Skip to main content
380 BK vs 630 XL 3 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Silfab SIL-380 BK vs Silfab SIL-630 XL

Silfab
SIL-380 BK
380 Wp 21.40 % PERC
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Silfab
SIL-630 XL
630 Wp 22.56 % N-type Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

630 XL leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.16 pp more efficient. 3 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 16 differences
How alike are they
3 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

16 of 19 parameters
Parameter 380 BK 630 XL Difference
Module efficiency 21.40 % 22.56 % 1.16 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient -0.377 %/°C -0.290 %/°C 0.087 %/°C better in heat
Rated power 380 Wp 630 Wp 250 W more power
Annual degradation 0.50 %/yr 0.30 %/yr 0.20 %/yr slower
Power density 213.8 Wp/m² 225.6 Wp/m² 11.7 Wp/m² higher
Weight 19.0 kg 29.5 kg 10.5 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage 45.13 V 57.49 V 12.36 V apart
Short-circuit current 10.50 A 13.66 A 3.16 A apart
Module area 1.777 m² 2.793 m² 1.016 m² apart
Cell technology PERC N-type PERC vs N-type
Weight per kWp 50.0 kg/kWp 46.8 kg/kWp 3.2 kg/kWp lighter
Voltage at max power 38.88 V 48.47 V 9.59 V apart
Current at max power 9.79 A 13.00 A 3.21 A apart
Cell count 66 156 90 cells apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
Dimensions 1795x990x38 mm 2465x1133x35 mm 1795x990x38 mm vs 2465x1133x35 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
380 BK
12,291 kWh
630 XL
21,240 kWh
Lifetime gap
8,949 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 380 BK 630 XL
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 380 W 630 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.3% of rated power 359 W 603 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 88.7% of rated power 337 W 575 W
Hot roof 70 °C 83.0% of rated power 316 W 548 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 380 BK 630 XL Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 380 Wp 630 Wp +250 W for 630 XL
Module efficiency 21.40 % 22.56 % +1.16 pp for 630 XL
Power density 213.8 Wp/m² 225.6 Wp/m² +11.7 Wp/m² for 630 XL
Open-circuit voltage 45.13 V 57.49 V 12.36 V apart
Voltage at max power 38.88 V 48.47 V 9.59 V apart
Short-circuit current 10.50 A 13.66 A 3.16 A apart
Current at max power 9.79 A 13.00 A 3.21 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.377 %/°C -0.290 %/°C +0.087 %/°C for 630 XL
Mechanical
Dimensions 1795x990x38 mm 2465x1133x35 mm 1795x990x38 mm vs 2465x1133x35 mm
Module area 1.777 m² 2.793 m² 1.016 m² apart
Weight 19.0 kg 29.5 kg -10.5 kg for 380 BK
Weight per kWp 50.0 kg/kWp 46.8 kg/kWp -3.2 kg/kWp for 630 XL
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.50 %/yr 0.30 %/yr -0.20 %/yr for 630 XL
Technology
Cell technology PERC N-type PERC vs N-type
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 66 156 90 cells apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#8,388 vs #3,959
630 XL leads by 4,429 places
Power density
#8,409 vs #3,927
630 XL leads by 4,482 places
Heat behaviour
#13,470 vs #2,220
630 XL leads by 11,250 places
Weight
#3,329 vs #1,365
630 XL leads by 1,964 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#9,853 vs #1,047
630 XL leads by 8,806 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-380 BK vs Silfab SIL-430 BG+
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-380 BK vs Silfab SIL-420-BG
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-380 BK vs Silfab SIL-410-BG
7 differences, the largest is annual degradation
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-380 BK vs Silfab SIL-370 BK
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-630 XL vs Silfab SIL-640 XL
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-630 XL vs Silfab SIL-620 XL
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Silfab SIL-380 BK or Silfab SIL-630 XL?
According to our database: Silfab SIL-630 XL has higher module efficiency (22.56% vs 21.40%); Silfab SIL-630 XL tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.290%/°C vs -0.377%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Silfab SIL-380 BK and Silfab SIL-630 XL?
Silfab SIL-380 BK has a module efficiency of 21.40%, while Silfab SIL-630 XL is 22.56%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Silfab SIL-380 BK use vs Silfab SIL-630 XL?
Silfab SIL-380 BK uses PERC cells; Silfab SIL-630 XL uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Silfab SIL-380 BK and Silfab SIL-630 XL?
Silfab SIL-380 BK has a 30 years power warranty; Silfab SIL-630 XL has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Silfab SIL-380 BK and Silfab SIL-630 XL bifacial panels?
Silfab SIL-630 XL is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Silfab SIL-380 BK is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 2 Silfab offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.