JA Solar JAM78D30-580/MB/1500V vs JA Solar JAM72S30-540/MR/1500V
VS
The verdict
12 differences, and they point both ways
The largest is rated power: 40 W more power. 7 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 12 differencesHow alike are they
7
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
12 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
JAM78D30-580/MB/1500V
JAM72S30-540/MR/1500V
Difference
Rated power
580 Wp
540 Wp
40 W more power
Performance warranty
30 yrs
25 yrs
5 yrs longer
Weight
33.4 kg
27.3 kg
6.1 kg lighter
Weight per kWp
57.6 kg/kWp
50.6 kg/kWp
7.0 kg/kWp lighter
Annual degradation
0.45 %/yr
0.55 %/yr
0.10 %/yr slower
Module area
2.795 m²
2.583 m²
0.212 m² apart
Open-circuit voltage
53.11 V
49.60 V
3.51 V apart
Module efficiency
20.70 %
20.90 %
0.20 pp more efficient
Cell count
156
144
12 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
Voltage at max power
44.35 V
41.64 V
2.71 V apart
Dimensions
2465x1134x35 mm
2278x1134x30 mm
2465x1134x35 mm vs 2278x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.350 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
JAM78D30-580/MB/1500V
19,100 kWh
JAM72S30-540/MR/1500V
17,501 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,599 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
JAM78D30-580/MB/1500V
JAM72S30-540/MR/1500V
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
580 W
540 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.8% of rated power
550 W
512 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.5% of rated power
519 W
483 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.2% of rated power
489 W
455 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
JAM78D30-580/MB/1500V
JAM72S30-540/MR/1500V
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
580 Wp
540 Wp
+40 W for JAM78D30-580/MB/1500V
Module efficiency
20.70 %
20.90 %
+0.20 pp for JAM72S30-540/MR/1500V
Power density
207.5 Wp/m²
209.0 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
53.11 V
49.60 V
3.51 V apart
Voltage at max power
44.35 V
41.64 V
2.71 V apart
Short-circuit current
13.84 A
13.86 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
13.08 A
12.97 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.350 %/°C
-0.350 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2465x1134x35 mm
2278x1134x30 mm
2465x1134x35 mm vs 2278x1134x30 mm
Module area
2.795 m²
2.583 m²
0.212 m² apart
Weight
33.4 kg
27.3 kg
-6.1 kg for JAM72S30-540/MR/1500V
Weight per kWp
57.6 kg/kWp
50.6 kg/kWp
-7.0 kg/kWp for JAM72S30-540/MR/1500V
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
25 yrs
+5 yrs for JAM78D30-580/MB/1500V
Annual degradation
0.45 %/yr
0.55 %/yr
-0.10 %/yr for JAM78D30-580/MB/1500V
Technology
Cell technology
PERC
PERC
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
156
144
12 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#10,842
vs
#10,148
JAM72S30-540/MR/1500V leads by 694 places
Power density
#10,672
vs
#10,176
JAM72S30-540/MR/1500V leads by 496 places
Heat behaviour
#10,489
vs
#10,489
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#11,388
vs
#3,965
JAM72S30-540/MR/1500V leads by 7,423 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#9,912
JAM78D30-580/MB/1500V leads by 9,891 places
Overall
#6,690
vs
#8,957
JAM78D30-580/MB/1500V leads by 2,267 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM78D30-580/MB/1500V vs JA Solar JAM78D30-605/MB/1500V
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM78D30-580/MB/1500V vs JA Solar JAM78D30-600/MB/1500V
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM78D30-580/MB/1500V vs JA Solar JAM78D30-595/MB/1500V
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM78D30-580/MB/1500V vs JA Solar JAM78D30-590/MB/1500V
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM78D30-580/MB/1500V vs JA Solar JAM78D30-585/MB/1500V
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM78D30-580/MB/1500V vs JA Solar JAM72D30-580/LB/1500V
9 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: JA Solar JAM78D30-580/MB/1500V or JA Solar JAM72S30-540/MR/1500V?
According to our database: JA Solar JAM72S30-540/MR/1500V has higher module efficiency (20.90% vs 20.70%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of JA Solar JAM78D30-580/MB/1500V and JA Solar JAM72S30-540/MR/1500V?
JA Solar JAM78D30-580/MB/1500V has a module efficiency of 20.70%, while JA Solar JAM72S30-540/MR/1500V is 20.90%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does JA Solar JAM78D30-580/MB/1500V use vs JA Solar JAM72S30-540/MR/1500V?
JA Solar JAM78D30-580/MB/1500V uses PERC cells; JA Solar JAM72S30-540/MR/1500V uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on JA Solar JAM78D30-580/MB/1500V and JA Solar JAM72S30-540/MR/1500V?
JA Solar JAM78D30-580/MB/1500V has a 30 years power warranty; JA Solar JAM72S30-540/MR/1500V has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are JA Solar JAM78D30-580/MB/1500V and JA Solar JAM72S30-540/MR/1500V bifacial panels?
JA Solar JAM78D30-580/MB/1500V is bifacial (captures light from both faces); JA Solar JAM72S30-540/MR/1500V is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 328 JA Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.