Runergy HY-DH132N10-725 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-720
VS
The verdict
DH132H10-Plus-720 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.030 %/°C better in heat. 13 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 6 differencesHow alike are they
13
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
6 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
DH132N10-725
DH132H10-Plus-720
Difference
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
0.030 %/°C better in heat
Cell technology
N-type
HJT
N-type vs HJT
Short-circuit current
18.54 A
17.67 A
0.87 A apart
Open-circuit voltage
49.58 V
50.74 V
1.16 V apart
Current at max power
17.48 A
16.87 A
0.61 A apart
Voltage at max power
41.48 V
42.68 V
1.20 V apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
DH132N10-725
24,325 kWh
DH132H10-Plus-720
24,233 kWh
Lifetime gap
92 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
DH132N10-725
DH132H10-Plus-720
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
725 W
720 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
693 W
692 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
662 W
664 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
630 W
636 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
DH132N10-725
DH132H10-Plus-720
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
725 Wp
720 Wp
Effectively the same
Module efficiency
23.30 %
23.20 %
Effectively the same
Power density
233.4 Wp/m²
231.8 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
49.58 V
50.74 V
1.16 V apart
Voltage at max power
41.48 V
42.68 V
1.20 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.54 A
17.67 A
0.87 A apart
Current at max power
17.48 A
16.87 A
0.61 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
+0.030 %/°C for DH132H10-Plus-720
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2384x1303x35 mm
Same
Module area
3.106 m²
3.106 m²
Same
Weight
38.5 kg
38.5 kg
Same
Weight per kWp
53.1 kg/kWp
53.5 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.38 %/yr
Effectively the same
Technology
Cell technology
N-type
HJT
N-type vs HJT
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,057
vs
#1,349
DH132N10-725 leads by 292 places
Power density
#974
vs
#1,390
DH132N10-725 leads by 416 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220
vs
#515
DH132H10-Plus-720 leads by 1,705 places
Weight
#6,940
vs
#7,493
DH132N10-725 leads by 553 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#438
vs
#538
DH132N10-725 leads by 100 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132N10-725 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-740
8 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132N10-725 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-735
8 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132N10-725 vs Runergy HY-DH132N10-730
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132N10-725 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-730
6 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132N10-725 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-725
6 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132N10-725 vs Runergy HY-DH132N10-720
The same specification on paper
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Runergy HY-DH132N10-725 or Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-720?
According to our database: Runergy HY-DH132N10-725 has higher module efficiency (23.30% vs 23.20%); Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-720 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Runergy HY-DH132N10-725 and Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-720?
Runergy HY-DH132N10-725 has a module efficiency of 23.30%, while Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-720 is 23.20%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Runergy HY-DH132N10-725 use vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-720?
Runergy HY-DH132N10-725 uses N-type cells; Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-720 uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Runergy HY-DH132N10-725 and Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-720?
Runergy HY-DH132N10-725 has a 30 years power warranty; Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-720 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Runergy HY-DH132N10-725 and Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-720 bifacial panels?
Both Runergy HY-DH132N10-725 and Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-720 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 5 Runergy offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.