Runergy HY-DH132N10-720 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-740
VS
The verdict
DH132H10-Plus-740 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.60 pp more efficient. 11 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 8 differencesHow alike are they
11
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
8 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
DH132N10-720
DH132H10-Plus-740
Difference
Module efficiency
23.20 %
23.80 %
0.60 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
0.030 %/°C better in heat
Power density
231.8 Wp/m²
238.2 Wp/m²
6.4 Wp/m² higher
Rated power
720 Wp
740 Wp
20 W more power
Cell technology
N-type
HJT
N-type vs HJT
Open-circuit voltage
49.39 V
51.34 V
1.95 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.49 A
17.91 A
0.58 A apart
Voltage at max power
41.29 V
43.25 V
1.96 V apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
DH132N10-720
24,157 kWh
DH132H10-Plus-740
24,906 kWh
Lifetime gap
749 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
DH132N10-720
DH132H10-Plus-740
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
720 W
740 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
689 W
711 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
657 W
682 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
626 W
653 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
DH132N10-720
DH132H10-Plus-740
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
720 Wp
740 Wp
+20 W for DH132H10-Plus-740
Module efficiency
23.20 %
23.80 %
+0.60 pp for DH132H10-Plus-740
Power density
231.8 Wp/m²
238.2 Wp/m²
+6.4 Wp/m² for DH132H10-Plus-740
Open-circuit voltage
49.39 V
51.34 V
1.95 V apart
Voltage at max power
41.29 V
43.25 V
1.96 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.49 A
17.91 A
0.58 A apart
Current at max power
17.44 A
17.11 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
+0.030 %/°C for DH132H10-Plus-740
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2384x1303x35 mm
Same
Module area
3.106 m²
3.106 m²
Same
Weight
38.5 kg
38.5 kg
Same
Weight per kWp
53.5 kg/kWp
52.0 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.38 %/yr
Effectively the same
Technology
Cell technology
N-type
HJT
N-type vs HJT
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,349
vs
#462
DH132H10-Plus-740 leads by 887 places
Power density
#1,390
vs
#460
DH132H10-Plus-740 leads by 930 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220
vs
#515
DH132H10-Plus-740 leads by 1,705 places
Weight
#7,493
vs
#5,511
DH132H10-Plus-740 leads by 1,982 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#538
vs
#191
DH132H10-Plus-740 leads by 347 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132N10-720 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-735
8 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132N10-720 vs Runergy HY-DH132N10-730
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132N10-720 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-730
8 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132N10-720 vs Runergy HY-DH132N10-725
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132N10-720 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-725
6 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132N10-720 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-720
6 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Runergy HY-DH132N10-720 or Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-740?
According to our database: Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-740 has higher module efficiency (23.80% vs 23.20%); Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-740 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Runergy HY-DH132N10-720 and Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-740?
Runergy HY-DH132N10-720 has a module efficiency of 23.20%, while Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-740 is 23.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Runergy HY-DH132N10-720 use vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-740?
Runergy HY-DH132N10-720 uses N-type cells; Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-740 uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Runergy HY-DH132N10-720 and Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-740?
Runergy HY-DH132N10-720 has a 30 years power warranty; Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-740 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Runergy HY-DH132N10-720 and Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-740 bifacial panels?
Both Runergy HY-DH132N10-720 and Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-740 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 5 Runergy offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.