Runergy HY-DH132H10-735 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-730
VS
The verdict
HY-DH132H10-735 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.030 %/°C better in heat. 13 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 6 differencesHow alike are they
13
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
6 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
HY-DH132H10-735
TSM-NEG21C.20-730
Difference
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
0.030 %/°C better in heat
Cell technology
HJT
TOPCon
HJT vs TOPCon
Module efficiency
23.70 %
23.50 %
0.20 pp more efficient
Short-circuit current
17.85 A
18.58 A
0.73 A apart
Open-circuit voltage
51.19 V
49.90 V
1.29 V apart
Voltage at max power
43.11 V
41.70 V
1.41 V apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
HY-DH132H10-735
24,737 kWh
TSM-NEG21C.20-730
24,493 kWh
Lifetime gap
244 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
HY-DH132H10-735
TSM-NEG21C.20-730
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
735 W
730 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
706 W
698 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
678 W
666 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
649 W
635 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
HY-DH132H10-735
TSM-NEG21C.20-730
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
735 Wp
730 Wp
Effectively the same
Module efficiency
23.70 %
23.50 %
+0.20 pp for HY-DH132H10-735
Power density
236.6 Wp/m²
235.0 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
51.19 V
49.90 V
1.29 V apart
Voltage at max power
43.11 V
41.70 V
1.41 V apart
Short-circuit current
17.85 A
18.58 A
0.73 A apart
Current at max power
17.05 A
17.51 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
+0.030 %/°C for HY-DH132H10-735
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
Same
Module area
3.106 m²
3.106 m²
Same
Weight
38.3 kg
38.3 kg
Same
Weight per kWp
52.1 kg/kWp
52.5 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.38 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Effectively the same
Technology
Cell technology
HJT
TOPCon
HJT vs TOPCon
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#549
vs
#749
HY-DH132H10-735 leads by 200 places
Power density
#614
vs
#836
HY-DH132H10-735 leads by 222 places
Heat behaviour
#515
vs
#2,220
HY-DH132H10-735 leads by 1,705 places
Weight
#5,616
vs
#6,040
HY-DH132H10-735 leads by 424 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#234
vs
#316
HY-DH132H10-735 leads by 82 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132H10-735 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-740
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132H10-735 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-740
One difference: dimensions
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132H10-735 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-735
One difference: dimensions
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132H10-735 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-730
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132H10-735 vs Runergy HY-DH132N10-730
7 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132H10-735 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-730
2 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Runergy HY-DH132H10-735 or Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-730?
According to our database: Runergy HY-DH132H10-735 has higher module efficiency (23.70% vs 23.50%); Runergy HY-DH132H10-735 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Runergy HY-DH132H10-735 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-730?
Runergy HY-DH132H10-735 has a module efficiency of 23.70%, while Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-730 is 23.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Runergy HY-DH132H10-735 use vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-730?
Runergy HY-DH132H10-735 uses HJT cells; Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-730 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Runergy HY-DH132H10-735 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-730?
Runergy HY-DH132H10-735 has a 30 years power warranty; Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-730 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Runergy HY-DH132H10-735 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-730 bifacial panels?
Both Runergy HY-DH132H10-735 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-730 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 5 Runergy offers · See 186 Trina Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.