Runergy HY-DH108N11-525 vs Runergy HY-DH108N8-430
VS
The verdict
DH108N11-525 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 1.60 pp more efficient. 8 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 11 differencesHow alike are they
8
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
11 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
DH108N11-525
DH108N8-430
Difference
Module efficiency
23.60 %
22.00 %
1.60 pp more efficient
Rated power
525 Wp
430 Wp
95 W more power
Power density
236.1 Wp/m²
220.2 Wp/m²
15.9 Wp/m² higher
Weight
27.5 kg
24.2 kg
3.3 kg lighter
Short-circuit current
16.08 A
13.72 A
2.36 A apart
Module area
2.224 m²
1.953 m²
0.271 m² apart
Weight per kWp
52.4 kg/kWp
56.3 kg/kWp
3.9 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage
41.49 V
38.78 V
2.71 V apart
Current at max power
15.32 A
13.09 A
2.23 A apart
Dimensions
1961x1134x30 mm
1722x1134x30 mm
1961x1134x30 mm vs 1722x1134x30 mm
Voltage at max power
34.27 V
32.85 V
1.42 V apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
DH108N11-525
17,615 kWh
DH108N8-430
14,427 kWh
Lifetime gap
3,188 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
DH108N11-525
DH108N8-430
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
525 W
430 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
502 W
411 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
479 W
393 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
456 W
374 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
DH108N11-525
DH108N8-430
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
525 Wp
430 Wp
+95 W for DH108N11-525
Module efficiency
23.60 %
22.00 %
+1.60 pp for DH108N11-525
Power density
236.1 Wp/m²
220.2 Wp/m²
+15.9 Wp/m² for DH108N11-525
Open-circuit voltage
41.49 V
38.78 V
2.71 V apart
Voltage at max power
34.27 V
32.85 V
1.42 V apart
Short-circuit current
16.08 A
13.72 A
2.36 A apart
Current at max power
15.32 A
13.09 A
2.23 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
1961x1134x30 mm
1722x1134x30 mm
1961x1134x30 mm vs 1722x1134x30 mm
Module area
2.224 m²
1.953 m²
0.271 m² apart
Weight
27.5 kg
24.2 kg
-3.3 kg for DH108N8-430
Weight per kWp
52.4 kg/kWp
56.3 kg/kWp
-3.9 kg/kWp for DH108N11-525
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
N-type
N-type
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
108
108
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#627
vs
#6,517
DH108N11-525 leads by 5,890 places
Power density
#645
vs
#6,481
DH108N11-525 leads by 5,836 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#5,859
vs
#10,540
DH108N11-525 leads by 4,681 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#5,035
vs
#10,096
DH108N11-525 leads by 5,061 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH108N11-525 vs Runergy HY-DH108N11-530
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH108N11-525 vs Runergy HY-DH108N11-520
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH108N11-525 vs Runergy HY-DH108N11-515
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH108N11-525 vs Runergy HY-DH108N11-510
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH108N11-525 vs Runergy HY-DH108N11-505
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH108N11-525 vs Runergy HY-DH108N11-500
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Runergy HY-DH108N11-525 or Runergy HY-DH108N8-430?
According to our database: Runergy HY-DH108N11-525 has higher module efficiency (23.60% vs 22.00%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Runergy HY-DH108N11-525 and Runergy HY-DH108N8-430?
Runergy HY-DH108N11-525 has a module efficiency of 23.60%, while Runergy HY-DH108N8-430 is 22.00%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Runergy HY-DH108N11-525 use vs Runergy HY-DH108N8-430?
Runergy HY-DH108N11-525 uses N-type cells; Runergy HY-DH108N8-430 uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Runergy HY-DH108N11-525 and Runergy HY-DH108N8-430?
Runergy HY-DH108N11-525 has a 30 years power warranty; Runergy HY-DH108N8-430 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Runergy HY-DH108N11-525 and Runergy HY-DH108N8-430 bifacial panels?
Both Runergy HY-DH108N11-525 and Runergy HY-DH108N8-430 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 3 Runergy offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.