Skip to main content
515 vs 525 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Runergy HY-DH108N11-515 vs Runergy HY-DH108N11-525

Runergy HY-DH108N11-515
Runergy
HY-DH108N11-515
515 Wp 23.20 % N-type Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Runergy HY-DH108N11-525
Runergy
HY-DH108N11-525
525 Wp 23.60 % N-type Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

525 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.40 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter 515 525 Difference
Module efficiency 23.20 % 23.60 % 0.40 pp more efficient
Power density 231.6 Wp/m² 236.1 Wp/m² 4.5 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 515 Wp 525 Wp 10 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
515
17,279 kWh
525
17,615 kWh
Lifetime gap
336 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 515 525
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 515 W 525 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 493 W 502 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 470 W 479 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 448 W 456 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 515 525 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 515 Wp 525 Wp +10 W for 525
Module efficiency 23.20 % 23.60 % +0.40 pp for 525
Power density 231.6 Wp/m² 236.1 Wp/m² +4.5 Wp/m² for 525
Open-circuit voltage 40.89 V 41.49 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 33.89 V 34.27 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 15.98 A 16.08 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 15.20 A 15.32 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1961x1134x30 mm 1961x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 2.224 m² 2.224 m² Same
Weight 27.5 kg 27.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 53.4 kg/kWp 52.4 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology N-type N-type Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#1,349 vs #659
525 leads by 690 places
Power density
#1,518 vs #678
525 leads by 840 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220 vs #2,220
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#7,387 vs #5,904
525 leads by 1,483 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#5,900 vs #5,094
525 leads by 806 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH108N11-515 vs Runergy HY-DH108N11-530
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH108N11-515 vs Runergy HY-DH108N11-520
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH108N11-515 vs Runergy HY-DH108N11-510
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH108N11-515 vs Runergy HY-DH108N11-505
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH108N11-515 vs Runergy HY-DH108N11-500
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH108N11-515 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-740
13 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Runergy HY-DH108N11-515 or Runergy HY-DH108N11-525?
According to our database: Runergy HY-DH108N11-525 has higher module efficiency (23.60% vs 23.20%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Runergy HY-DH108N11-515 and Runergy HY-DH108N11-525?
Runergy HY-DH108N11-515 has a module efficiency of 23.20%, while Runergy HY-DH108N11-525 is 23.60%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Runergy HY-DH108N11-515 use vs Runergy HY-DH108N11-525?
Runergy HY-DH108N11-515 uses N-type cells; Runergy HY-DH108N11-525 uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Runergy HY-DH108N11-515 and Runergy HY-DH108N11-525?
Runergy HY-DH108N11-515 has a 30 years power warranty; Runergy HY-DH108N11-525 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Runergy HY-DH108N11-515 and Runergy HY-DH108N11-525 bifacial panels?
Both Runergy HY-DH108N11-515 and Runergy HY-DH108N11-525 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 5 Runergy offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.