Skip to main content
RPS2MH72BD535 vs RPS2MH72BD550 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD535 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD550

Renew Photovoltaics
RPS2MH72BD535
535 Wp 20.71 % PERC Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Renew Photovoltaics
RPS2MH72BD550
550 Wp 21.29 % PERC Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

RPS2MH72BD550 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.58 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter RPS2MH72BD535 RPS2MH72BD550 Difference
Module efficiency 20.71 % 21.29 % 0.58 pp more efficient
Power density 207.1 Wp/m² 212.9 Wp/m² 5.8 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 535 Wp 550 Wp 15 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.320 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
RPS2MH72BD535
17,618 kWh
RPS2MH72BD550
18,112 kWh
Lifetime gap
494 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario RPS2MH72BD535 RPS2MH72BD550
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 535 W 550 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.2% of rated power 509 W 524 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 90.4% of rated power 484 W 497 W
Hot roof 70 °C 85.6% of rated power 458 W 471 W
03

Full specification

Parameter RPS2MH72BD535 RPS2MH72BD550 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 535 Wp 550 Wp +15 W for RPS2MH72BD550
Module efficiency 20.71 % 21.29 % +0.58 pp for RPS2MH72BD550
Power density 207.1 Wp/m² 212.9 Wp/m² +5.8 Wp/m² for RPS2MH72BD550
Open-circuit voltage 49.55 V 49.74 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 40.61 V 40.90 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 13.79 A 14.03 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.18 A 13.45 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.320 %/°C -0.320 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2278x1134x30 mm 2278x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 2.583 m² 2.583 m² Same
Weight 32.5 kg 32.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 60.7 kg/kWp 59.1 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.45 %/yr 0.45 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology PERC PERC Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 144 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#10,799 vs #8,776
RPS2MH72BD550 leads by 2,023 places
Power density
#10,842 vs #8,563
RPS2MH72BD550 leads by 2,279 places
Heat behaviour
#8,376 vs #8,376
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#12,618 vs #12,099
RPS2MH72BD550 leads by 519 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#8,411 vs #7,059
RPS2MH72BD550 leads by 1,352 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Renew Photovoltaics
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD535 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD560
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Renew Photovoltaics
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD535 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD555
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Renew Photovoltaics
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD535 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD545
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Renew Photovoltaics
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD535 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD540
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Renew Photovoltaics
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD535 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD530
The same specification on paper
Same manufacturer
Renew Photovoltaics
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD535 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS3MH66BDXXX
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD535 or Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD550?
According to our database: Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD550 has higher module efficiency (21.29% vs 20.71%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD535 and Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD550?
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD535 has a module efficiency of 20.71%, while Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD550 is 21.29%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD535 use vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD550?
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD535 uses PERC cells; Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD550 uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD535 and Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD550?
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD535 has a 30 years power warranty; Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD550 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD535 and Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD550 bifacial panels?
Both Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD535 and Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD550 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.