Skip to main content
620-THGB-G12R vs 625-THGB-G12R 19 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Premier Energies PE-132-620-THGB-G12R vs Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R

Premier Energies
PE-132-620-THGB-G12R
620 Wp 22.95 % N-type Bifacial
VS
Premier Energies
PE-132-625-THGB-G12R
625 Wp 23.13 % N-type Bifacial
The verdict

Identical on every published parameter

All 19 comparable parameters agree. Two records this alike are usually one panel sold under two names, or two bins of the same production line - decide on price and on who you would rather buy from.

How alike are they
19 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

0 of 19 parameters

Every comparable parameter agrees. The full specification is below.

02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
620-THGB-G12R
20,802 kWh
625-THGB-G12R
20,970 kWh
Lifetime gap
168 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 620-THGB-G12R 625-THGB-G12R
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 620 W 625 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 593 W 598 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 566 W 571 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 539 W 543 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 620-THGB-G12R 625-THGB-G12R Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 620 Wp 625 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 22.95 % 23.13 % Effectively the same
Power density 229.5 Wp/m² 231.4 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 49.34 V 49.47 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 41.76 V 41.94 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 15.63 A 15.64 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 14.85 A 14.90 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2382x1134x35 mm 2382x1134x35 mm Same
Module area 2.701 m² 2.701 m² Same
Weight 33.5 kg 33.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 54.0 kg/kWp 53.6 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology N-type N-type Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#2,320 vs #1,609
625-THGB-G12R leads by 711 places
Power density
#2,243 vs #1,558
625-THGB-G12R leads by 685 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220 vs #2,220
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#8,326 vs #7,672
625-THGB-G12R leads by 654 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,617 vs #2,276
625-THGB-G12R leads by 341 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-132-620-THGB-G12R vs Premier Energies PE-132-630-THGB-G12R
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-132-620-THGB-G12R vs Premier Energies PE-132-615-THGB-G12R
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-132-620-THGB-G12R vs Premier Energies PE-132-610-THGB-G12R
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-132-620-THGB-G12R vs Premier Energies PE-132-605-THGB-G12R
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-132-620-THGB-G12R vs Premier Energies PE-132-600-THGB-G12R
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-132-620-THGB-G12R vs Premier Energies PE-590 TB M10_1A
12 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Premier Energies PE-132-620-THGB-G12R or Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R?
According to our database: Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R has higher module efficiency (23.13% vs 22.95%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Premier Energies PE-132-620-THGB-G12R and Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R?
Premier Energies PE-132-620-THGB-G12R has a module efficiency of 22.95%, while Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R is 23.13%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Premier Energies PE-132-620-THGB-G12R use vs Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R?
Premier Energies PE-132-620-THGB-G12R uses N-type cells; Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Premier Energies PE-132-620-THGB-G12R and Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R?
Premier Energies PE-132-620-THGB-G12R has a 30 years power warranty; Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Premier Energies PE-132-620-THGB-G12R and Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R bifacial panels?
Both Premier Energies PE-132-620-THGB-G12R and Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.